2.3 sec in total
286 ms
1.7 sec
375 ms
Click here to check amazing Tuliva content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tuliva.com
Does your information technology give you a competitive advantage? We provide an end-to-end IT solution to meet all of your business needs.
Visit tuliva.comWe analyzed Tuliva.com page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
tuliva.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
51/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value2.9 s
94/100
10%
Value190 ms
91/100
30%
Value0.099
90/100
15%
Value3.8 s
89/100
10%
286 ms
303 ms
78 ms
90 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Tuliva.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (690 ms) belongs to the original domain Tuliva.com.
Page size can be reduced by 272.8 kB (65%)
420.0 kB
147.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Tuliva.com main page is 420.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 271.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 113.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 113.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 159.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 159.7 kB or 59% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (79%)
78
16
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tuliva. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tuliva.com
286 ms
2381450060.js
303 ms
css
78 ms
css
90 ms
css
102 ms
styles.css
54 ms
settings.css
80 ms
sfsi-style.css
159 ms
chosen.css
104 ms
frontend.css
154 ms
rgs.css
211 ms
font-awesome.min.css
102 ms
main.css
240 ms
responsive.css
206 ms
js_composer.css
366 ms
masterslider.main.css
370 ms
custom.css
208 ms
jquery.js
288 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
233 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
352 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
351 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
399 ms
modernizr.js
351 ms
plusone.js
72 ms
platform.js
103 ms
in.js
28 ms
addthis_widget.js
47 ms
core.min.js
416 ms
widget.min.js
335 ms
position.min.js
335 ms
menu.min.js
378 ms
autocomplete.min.js
380 ms
wpss-search-suggest.js
551 ms
jquery.form.min.js
445 ms
scripts.js
414 ms
jquery-ui-min.js
442 ms
modernizr.custom.min.js
441 ms
jquery.shuffle.min.js
440 ms
random-shuffle-min.js
441 ms
custom.js
441 ms
superfish.js
440 ms
sticky.js
441 ms
prettyPhoto.js
571 ms
isotope.min.js
544 ms
init.js
690 ms
nectar-slider.js
501 ms
comment-reply.min.js
434 ms
js_composer_front.js
473 ms
event
37 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
358 ms
fbevents.js
43 ms
Rebrand_Master-17.png
248 ms
Rebrand_Master_Cloud-300x300.jpg
248 ms
Rebrand_Master_Devops-300x300.jpg
248 ms
Rebrand_Master_Security-300x300.jpg
247 ms
9k-RPmcnxYEPm8CNFsH2gg.woff
184 ms
KT3KS9Aol4WfR6Vas8kNcg.woff
215 ms
OpenSans-Light-webfont.woff
267 ms
OpenSansBold-webfont.woff
267 ms
icomoon.woff
266 ms
fontawesome-webfont.svg
499 ms
analytics.js
100 ms
179 ms
sdk.js
208 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
91 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
198 ms
widgets.js
534 ms
gtm.js
139 ms
635059.js
425 ms
collect
66 ms
collect
341 ms
collect
232 ms
300lo.json
122 ms
collect
108 ms
Tuliva-Cloud.jpg
193 ms
diagonal_line.png
109 ms
nectar-loading.gif
107 ms
pic-of-justine-website.jpeg
125 ms
97 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
77 ms
xd_arbiter.php
125 ms
xd_arbiter.php
180 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
82 ms
ga-audiences
103 ms
ga-audiences
68 ms
roundtrip.js
18 ms
__ptq.gif
15 ms
RPHQ6JVRXBHNBMILENTIVW.js
165 ms
tuliva.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
tuliva.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
tuliva.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't have a <title> element
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuliva.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tuliva.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tuliva.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tuliva. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: