Report Summary

  • 76

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    84% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 41% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    65% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    62% of websites

tungle.me

Just a moment...

Page Load Speed

6.6 sec in total

First Response

163 ms

Resources Loaded

6.2 sec

Page Rendered

276 ms

tungle.me screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tungle content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tungle.me

Visit tungle.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Tungle.me page load time and found that the first response time was 163 ms and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tungle.me performance score

76

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

14/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.3 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tungle.me

163 ms

areasnap.com

5974 ms

master-ResetCSS.css

12 ms

master-GlobalResults.css

14 ms

Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tungle.me, 50% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.firstlook.com and 25% (1 request) were made to Areasnap.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6 sec) relates to the external source Areasnap.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.9 kB (66%)

Content Size

2.8 kB

After Optimization

966 B

In fact, the total size of Tungle.me main page is 2.8 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 2.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 233 B

  • Original 603 B
  • After minification 554 B
  • After compression 370 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 233 B or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 2.2 kB
  • After minification 1.2 kB
  • After compression 596 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tungle.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

3

After Optimization

3

The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tungle. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

tungle.me accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

tungle.me best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

tungle.me SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tungle.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tungle.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tungle. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: