6.2 sec in total
1.2 sec
4.7 sec
236 ms
Welcome to tupack.es homepage info - get ready to check Tupack best content right away, or after learning these important things about tupack.es
Packs de limpieza, cocina, kits de bienvenida personalizados, amenities para Apartamentos turísticos, casas de turísmo rural, Aparta-hoteles
Visit tupack.esWe analyzed Tupack.es page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
tupack.es performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value19.8 s
0/100
25%
Value21.9 s
0/100
10%
Value740 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.842
4/100
15%
Value18.7 s
3/100
10%
1245 ms
466 ms
436 ms
214 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (97 requests) were addressed to the original Tupack.es, 1% (1 request) were made to W.sharethis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Wd-edge.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tupack.es.
Page size can be reduced by 906.8 kB (48%)
1.9 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Tupack.es main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 931.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tupack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 713.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 713.6 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tupack.es needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 69 (71%)
97
28
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tupack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.tupack.es
1245 ms
jquery-1.5.js
466 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
436 ms
ddsmoothmenu.js
214 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
215 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
222 ms
jquery.capSlide.js
219 ms
jquery.bgiframe.js
318 ms
jquery.dimensions.js
323 ms
jquery.tooltip.js
328 ms
jquery-css-transform.js
330 ms
jquery-animate-css-rotate-scale.js
424 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
429 ms
coin-slider.min.js
439 ms
mazine.js
437 ms
coin-slider-styles.css
528 ms
style.css
534 ms
yellow.css
536 ms
sharethis.css
544 ms
wpsc_colorbox.css
544 ms
wpsc-default.css
572 ms
compatibility.css
631 ms
styles.css
640 ms
nggallery.css
638 ms
shutter-reloaded.css
649 ms
buttons.js
9 ms
jquery.js
873 ms
sharethis.js
679 ms
wp-e-commerce.js
736 ms
jquery.infieldlabel.min.js
741 ms
ajax.js
743 ms
index.php
1177 ms
jquery.livequery.js
786 ms
user.js
840 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
844 ms
wpsc_colorbox.js
847 ms
shutter-reloaded.js
895 ms
public.css
942 ms
nivo-slider.css
751 ms
light.css
754 ms
flexslider.css
774 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
802 ms
ngg.slideshow.min.js
748 ms
jquery.form.min.js
748 ms
scripts.js
749 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
771 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
710 ms
jQuery.easing.min.js
742 ms
fonts.css
639 ms
reset.css
646 ms
960.css
674 ms
styles.css
710 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
741 ms
jquery.tooltip.css
742 ms
back.png
151 ms
TPK_logo_376x641.jpg
146 ms
cart_top.png
145 ms
cart_back.png
144 ms
cart_icon.png
148 ms
details.png
146 ms
cart_bottom.png
212 ms
cont_left.png
214 ms
cont_right.png
213 ms
cont_back.png
216 ms
cont_sep_hov.png
217 ms
cont_left_hov.png
220 ms
cont_back_hov.png
315 ms
cont_sep.png
317 ms
inp_left.png
319 ms
inp_back.png
322 ms
search_but.png
323 ms
loading.gif
329 ms
TPK_PUBLI_VENDING.jpg
626 ms
TPK_PUBLI_TR.jpg
523 ms
TPK_PUBLI_FOOD.jpg
739 ms
TPK_PUBLI_Urbam.jpg
678 ms
TPK_PUBLI_ApaTur.jpg
752 ms
TPK_CAT_Limpieza.jpg
547 ms
TPK_CAT_Vending.jpg
730 ms
TPK_CAT_Alimentos.jpg
765 ms
TPK_CAT_Bienvenida.jpg
833 ms
TPK_CAT_Romantico.jpg
891 ms
TPK_CAT_Personal.png
1040 ms
TPK_AtencioAlCient1-500x300.jpg
945 ms
box_top_left.png
839 ms
box_top_right.png
853 ms
box_bot_left.png
918 ms
box_bot_right.png
947 ms
box_top.png
962 ms
box_bot.png
977 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
1063 ms
COMMUNIS-webfont.woff
910 ms
box_right.png
917 ms
box_left.png
939 ms
footer_cover.png
956 ms
foot_back.png
967 ms
foot_cont_back.png
985 ms
overlay.png
947 ms
arrows.png
955 ms
tupack.es accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
tupack.es best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tupack.es SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tupack.es can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tupack.es main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tupack.es
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tupack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: