Report Summary

  • 69

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

tut.com

TUT - The Universe Talks® - TUT

Page Load Speed

43.9 sec in total

First Response

293 ms

Resources Loaded

21.5 sec

Page Rendered

22.2 sec

tut.com screenshot

About Website

Visit tut.com now to see the best up-to-date TUT content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tut.com

TUT’s mission is to remind others of life’s fundamental truths: that life is magical, we are powerful, and dreams really do come true.

Visit tut.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tut.com page load time and found that the first response time was 293 ms and then it took 43.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tut.com performance score

69

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.8 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.6 s

87/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.027

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tut.com

293 ms

www.tut.com

483 ms

jquery.min.js

138 ms

skel.min.js

94 ms

skel-layers.min.js

1061 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Tut.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9 sec) relates to the external source Facebook.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (7%)

Content Size

23.4 MB

After Optimization

21.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Tut.com main page is 23.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 22.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 50.9 kB

  • Original 60.3 kB
  • After minification 48.7 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.6 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 22.6 MB
  • After minification 21.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TUT images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 411.4 kB

  • Original 626.5 kB
  • After minification 578.2 kB
  • After compression 215.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 411.4 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 74.1 kB

  • Original 96.2 kB
  • After minification 94.8 kB
  • After compression 22.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tut.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (17%)

Requests Now

81

After Optimization

67

The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TUT. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tut.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

tut.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tut.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tut.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tut.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TUT. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: