3.2 sec in total
408 ms
2.4 sec
328 ms
Visit tuxbyte.com now to see the best up-to-date Tux Byte content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tuxbyte.com
Writing articles and tutorials about Unix and Linux for more than 10 years. Click to read TuxByte’s Substack, a Substack publication. Launched 3 days ago.
Visit tuxbyte.comWe analyzed Tuxbyte.com page load time and found that the first response time was 408 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
tuxbyte.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
67/100
10%
Value8.8 s
1/100
25%
Value3.3 s
90/100
10%
Value2,990 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.623
10/100
15%
Value12.9 s
13/100
10%
408 ms
480 ms
328 ms
397 ms
148 ms
Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Tuxbyte.com, 86% (12 requests) were made to Startpage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (493 ms) relates to the external source Startpage.com.
Page size can be reduced by 45.6 kB (78%)
58.3 kB
12.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Tuxbyte.com main page is 58.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 58.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 45.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 45.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (80%)
10
2
The browser has sent 10 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tux Byte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
tuxbyte.com
408 ms
tuxbyte.com
480 ms
www.startpage.com
328 ms
captcha-block
397 ms
polyfill-b823a6071e539e9e5fd3.js
148 ms
component---src-pages-captcha-block-js-9c4787680a193408f4f9.js
291 ms
61d6a51fa456977bf9d459804f978f1e85cbddbe-6f6085b9f82b997e4ab8.js
356 ms
e3739f4511eabbaf3798912f93892c29eb8892b7-60b799cf25e0e3f595f3.js
446 ms
473c024a3e133a24d2ea55dcfdeaa4c26c1993fa-efcd6a73c16dd5c6a608.js
194 ms
commons-a53556b86e1ba32ec677.js
416 ms
app-c2edf06d721c17ac0b42.js
493 ms
framework-510066a2b6ae13b2286e.js
418 ms
webpack-runtime-b6ba0f57380afe3f2178.js
337 ms
captcha_loading.gif
417 ms
tuxbyte.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tuxbyte.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tuxbyte.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tuxbyte.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tuxbyte.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tuxbyte.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tux Byte. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: