Tools & Wizards About Us
twittepaga.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 56

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 84

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    52% of websites

twittepaga.com

Flutter vs. React Native: Which one is Better for Your Project? | AppMaster

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

484 ms

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

twittepaga.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to twittepaga.com homepage info - get ready to check Twittepaga best content right away, or after learning these important things about twittepaga.com

A thorough comparison of Native React and Flutter. The guide tells you about the pros and cons, how well the app works, and which app development is the most cutting-edge.

Visit twittepaga.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Twittepaga.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

twittepaga.com performance score

56

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

82/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.3 s

91/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,750 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.0 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

twittepaga.com

57 ms

flutter-vs-react-native-which-one-is-better-for-your-project

149 ms

logo_full.2779212.svg

44 ms

icons.svg

50 ms

header-course.3aaea7e.png

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Twittepaga.com, 98% (58 requests) were made to Appmaster.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (189 ms) relates to the external source Appmaster.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 411.0 kB (75%)

Content Size

550.0 kB

After Optimization

139.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Twittepaga.com main page is 550.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 508.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 411.0 kB

  • Original 508.7 kB
  • After minification 499.1 kB
  • After compression 97.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 411.0 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 41.2 kB
  • After minification 41.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Twittepaga images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (58%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

24

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Twittepaga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

twittepaga.com

twittepaga.com

57 ms

flutter-vs-react-native-which-one-is-better-for-your-project

flutter-vs-react-native-which-one-is-better-for-your-project

149 ms

logo_full.2779212.svg

logo_full.2779212.svg

44 ms

icons.svg

icons.svg

50 ms

header-course.3aaea7e.png

header-course.3aaea7e.png

71 ms

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

60 ms

ko-flag.309ee53.svg

ko-flag.309ee53.svg

63 ms

zh-flag.35210ea.svg

zh-flag.35210ea.svg

61 ms

pt-flag.7d790c6.svg

pt-flag.7d790c6.svg

69 ms

hi-flag.cae64db.svg

hi-flag.cae64db.svg

68 ms

check-icon.svg

check-icon.svg

79 ms

arrow-right.svg

arrow-right.svg

76 ms

97 ms

121 ms

104 ms

box-logo.1e56cf1.svg

box-logo.1e56cf1.svg

85 ms

clock-ico.9dacea6.svg

clock-ico.9dacea6.svg

94 ms

powered-logo.cae3649.svg

powered-logo.cae3649.svg

96 ms

logo_footer.275d5fd.svg

logo_footer.275d5fd.svg

102 ms

medal-performer.b801d1f.svg

medal-performer.b801d1f.svg

112 ms

medal-performer-summer.8b627ca.svg

medal-performer-summer.8b627ca.svg

115 ms

medal-performer-fall.56aca05.svg

medal-performer-fall.56aca05.svg

118 ms

medal-asia-pacific.0d9649d.svg

medal-asia-pacific.0d9649d.svg

139 ms

top-post-badge.8cb4fff.svg

top-post-badge.8cb4fff.svg

123 ms

earth-ico.32aab03.svg

earth-ico.32aab03.svg

131 ms

acd64b5.js

acd64b5.js

126 ms

9c73b99.js

9c73b99.js

135 ms

d1bffc5.js

d1bffc5.js

134 ms

88d45dd.js

88d45dd.js

133 ms

879d78a.js

879d78a.js

139 ms

d148e54.js

d148e54.js

144 ms

f3e885d.js

f3e885d.js

147 ms

71d8909.js

71d8909.js

145 ms

e584ea1.js

e584ea1.js

158 ms

f3adf87.js

f3adf87.js

150 ms

a5c2b07.js

a5c2b07.js

152 ms

ac35b78.js

ac35b78.js

160 ms

85d190b.js

85d190b.js

162 ms

5bdde6f.js

5bdde6f.js

138 ms

7de04cc.js

7de04cc.js

128 ms

3042026.js

3042026.js

119 ms

f8d40a4.js

f8d40a4.js

130 ms

be634df.js

be634df.js

129 ms

0706eb7.js

0706eb7.js

186 ms

de10d7c.js

de10d7c.js

189 ms

41684aa.js

41684aa.js

187 ms

491e61d.js

491e61d.js

179 ms

b1012a7.js

b1012a7.js

183 ms

e1cf375.js

e1cf375.js

178 ms

99bf95a.js

99bf95a.js

170 ms

deccc86.js

deccc86.js

169 ms

936f50a.js

936f50a.js

170 ms

f80b69f.js

f80b69f.js

164 ms

5724406.js

5724406.js

167 ms

681aeb8.js

681aeb8.js

157 ms

8eb9bd6.js

8eb9bd6.js

154 ms

a0007ac.js

a0007ac.js

160 ms

594071e.js

594071e.js

163 ms

6632353.js

6632353.js

157 ms

Accessibility Review

twittepaga.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Best Practices

twittepaga.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

twittepaga.com SEO score

84

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Twittepaga.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Twittepaga.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

twittepaga.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Twittepaga. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: