Tools & Wizards About Us
twopeascleaning.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 52% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

twopeascleaning.com

Best Cleaning Services in Calgary: House, Commercial & Carpet Cleaning

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

344 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

258 ms

twopeascleaning.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Twopeas Cleaning content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about twopeascleaning.com

Two Peas Cleaning is a local, family owned and operated cleaning company. We offer a broad range of services, including regular maintenance cleaning, one-time cleaning, move out cleaning, commercial c...

Visit twopeascleaning.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Twopeascleaning.com page load time and found that the first response time was 344 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

twopeascleaning.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,600 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.084

93/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.twopeascleaning.com

344 ms

style.min.css

110 ms

css

38 ms

settings.css

168 ms

fontello.min.css

171 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Twopeascleaning.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (478 ms) belongs to the original domain Twopeascleaning.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 107.8 kB (31%)

Content Size

350.7 kB

After Optimization

242.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Twopeascleaning.com main page is 350.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 252.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 75.6 kB

  • Original 98.7 kB
  • After minification 95.5 kB
  • After compression 23.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.6 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 32.2 kB

  • Original 252.0 kB
  • After minification 219.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Twopeas Cleaning needs image optimization as it can save up to 32.2 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (82%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

10

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Twopeas Cleaning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.twopeascleaning.com

www.twopeascleaning.com

344 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

110 ms

css

css

38 ms

settings.css

settings.css

168 ms

fontello.min.css

fontello.min.css

171 ms

style.css

style.css

219 ms

core.animation.css

core.animation.css

163 ms

theme.shortcodes.min.css

theme.shortcodes.min.css

171 ms

skin.css

skin.css

178 ms

custom-style.css

custom-style.css

227 ms

responsive.css

responsive.css

228 ms

skin.responsive.min.css

skin.responsive.min.css

231 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

233 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

235 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

338 ms

style.css

style.css

277 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

333 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

277 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

333 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

294 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

333 ms

add_title_to_link.min.js

add_title_to_link.min.js

333 ms

js

js

77 ms

core.messages.min.css

core.messages.min.css

373 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

374 ms

superfish.min.js

superfish.min.js

373 ms

jquery.slidemenu.min.js

jquery.slidemenu.min.js

374 ms

core.utils.min.js

core.utils.min.js

373 ms

core.init.min.js

core.init.min.js

374 ms

theme.init.min.js

theme.init.min.js

375 ms

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

mediaelement-and-player.min.js

458 ms

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

mediaelement-migrate.min.js

456 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.js

wp-mediaelement.min.js

455 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

456 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

457 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

457 ms

index.js

index.js

476 ms

index.js

index.js

478 ms

api.js

api.js

45 ms

scripts.js

scripts.js

477 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

416 ms

index.js

index.js

361 ms

theme.shortcodes.min.js

theme.shortcodes.min.js

369 ms

core.messages.min.js

core.messages.min.js

429 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

428 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

401 ms

swiper.jquery.min.js

swiper.jquery.min.js

378 ms

forms.js

forms.js

373 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

371 ms

Two-Peas-Cleaning-Revision.png

Two-Peas-Cleaning-Revision.png

444 ms

twopeasslider2.jpg

twopeasslider2.jpg

444 ms

twopeasnicoleandkendra.jpg

twopeasnicoleandkendra.jpg

355 ms

women-avatar-100x100.png

women-avatar-100x100.png

352 ms

footer-bg.png

footer-bg.png

237 ms

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4Ag.woff

5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4Ag.woff

81 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERySiw.woff

5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERySiw.woff

234 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERySiw.woff

5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERySiw.woff

236 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiw.woff

5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiw.woff

236 ms

5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERySiw.woff

5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERySiw.woff

235 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

238 ms

FwZY7-Qmy14u9lezJ-6H6M8.woff

FwZY7-Qmy14u9lezJ-6H6M8.woff

174 ms

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js

81 ms

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js

83 ms

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

revolution.extension.navigation.min.js

166 ms

Accessibility Review

twopeascleaning.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

twopeascleaning.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

twopeascleaning.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Twopeascleaning.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Twopeascleaning.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

twopeascleaning.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Twopeas Cleaning. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: