2.3 sec in total
26 ms
966 ms
1.3 sec
Visit twuffer.com now to see the best up-to-date Twuffer content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about twuffer.com
SERP reviews index
Visit twuffer.comWe analyzed Twuffer.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
twuffer.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value11.7 s
0/100
10%
Value19.0 s
0/100
25%
Value12.3 s
3/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value11.7 s
17/100
10%
26 ms
143 ms
75 ms
126 ms
96 ms
Our browser made a total of 100 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Twuffer.com, 50% (50 requests) were made to Imagedelivery.net and 43% (43 requests) were made to Serp-co.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (285 ms) relates to the external source Imagedelivery.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.5 MB (69%)
3.7 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Twuffer.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 196.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 196.1 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Twuffer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 791.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Twuffer.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 791.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (40%)
97
58
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Twuffer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
twuffer.com
26 ms
143 ms
gtm.js
75 ms
theme.min.css
126 ms
custom.css
96 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
64 ms
logo-icon-serp_co.svg
93 ms
avatar-1.jpg
99 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
92 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
96 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
97 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
94 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
149 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
94 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
110 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
112 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
112 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
116 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
149 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
150 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
147 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
155 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
146 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
154 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
153 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
154 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
154 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
154 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
274 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
272 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
274 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
275 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
272 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
274 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
280 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
281 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
283 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
284 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
281 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
281 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
283 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
285 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
284 ms
jquery.min.js
81 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
103 ms
popper.min.js
99 ms
bootstrap.bundle.min.js
100 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
102 ms
bs-stepper.min.js
101 ms
simplebar.min.js
137 ms
select2.min.js
136 ms
tippy-bundle.umd.min.js
105 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
104 ms
tiny-slider.js
132 ms
tnsSlider.js
139 ms
beStepper.js
138 ms
ckeditor.js
148 ms
Sortable.min.js
138 ms
theme.min.js
139 ms
auth_handler.js
146 ms
comment.js
146 ms
upvote_bookmark.js
146 ms
edit_contribute.js
146 ms
search_autocomplete.js
241 ms
vedd3670a3b1c4e178fdfb0cc912d969e1713874337387
80 ms
logo-wordmark-serp_everything.svg
242 ms
facebook.svg
244 ms
instagram.svg
245 ms
twitter.svg
242 ms
linkedin.svg
261 ms
pinterest.svg
266 ms
github.svg
267 ms
discord.svg
268 ms
reddit.svg
270 ms
youtube.svg
269 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
234 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
204 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
203 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
204 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
201 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
202 ms
js
59 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
187 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
186 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
187 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
256 ms
css2
139 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
226 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
225 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
225 ms
w=300,h=300,fit=pad
223 ms
feather.css
173 ms
sun.svg
95 ms
main.js
44 ms
bootstrap-icons.css
17 ms
select2.min.css
17 ms
bootstrap-icons.woff
34 ms
tiny-slider.css
14 ms
simplebar.min.css
14 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
15 ms
twuffer.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
twuffer.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
twuffer.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Twuffer.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Twuffer.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
twuffer.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Twuffer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: