5.6 sec in total
566 ms
4.6 sec
464 ms
Visit txtelite.com now to see the best up-to-date Txtelite content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about txtelite.com
Visit txtelite.comWe analyzed Txtelite.com page load time and found that the first response time was 566 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
txtelite.com performance score
566 ms
442 ms
129 ms
130 ms
388 ms
Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Txtelite.com, 73% (72 requests) were made to Sun885.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Bdimg.share.baidu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Sun885.com.
Page size can be reduced by 245.7 kB (29%)
843.6 kB
597.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Txtelite.com main page is 843.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 575.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 11.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Txtelite needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 98.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.5 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 74.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Txtelite.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.2 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (35%)
98
64
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Txtelite. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
txtelite.com
566 ms
style.css
442 ms
tabs.js
129 ms
360.js
130 ms
jq.js
388 ms
jcarousellite.js
259 ms
layout.css
129 ms
page.css
194 ms
links.css
65 ms
www.sun885.com
645 ms
shell_v2.js
448 ms
top-logo.gif
66 ms
aa.gif
64 ms
bb.gif
67 ms
sub_tab_bg2.gif
67 ms
title_bg4.gif
66 ms
fl-bg.gif
65 ms
fbico.gif
113 ms
li_arrow3.gif
113 ms
title_bg3.gif
115 ms
li_arrow.gif
114 ms
green_skin2.png
116 ms
line_bg.gif
127 ms
logger.js
225 ms
bds_s_v2.js
447 ms
reset.css
250 ms
global.css
251 ms
index.css
173 ms
jquery-1.11.1.min.js
1095 ms
click.aspx
1025 ms
bdsstyle.css
225 ms
r5.gif
224 ms
bg.jpg
911 ms
sc.png
84 ms
sy.png
83 ms
x1.png
86 ms
x2.png
193 ms
x3.png
190 ms
x4.png
192 ms
x5.png
363 ms
x6.png
193 ms
x7.png
1033 ms
x8.png
380 ms
x9.png
299 ms
x10.png
410 ms
x11.png
393 ms
x12.png
1221 ms
x13.png
471 ms
x14.png
486 ms
t1.png
495 ms
t2.png
565 ms
t3.png
567 ms
t4.png
581 ms
t5.png
657 ms
hdbg.jpg
1731 ms
b1.png
669 ms
w1.gif
761 ms
w2.gif
763 ms
w3.gif
855 ms
w4.gif
857 ms
w5.gif
948 ms
w6.gif
950 ms
w7.gif
979 ms
w8.gif
1041 ms
w9.gif
1043 ms
w10.gif
1044 ms
w11.gif
1118 ms
w12.gif
1122 ms
y1.gif
1064 ms
y2.gif
1047 ms
y3.gif
1136 ms
y4.gif
1003 ms
y5.gif
1030 ms
y6.gif
1037 ms
y7.gif
1077 ms
y8.gif
1014 ms
y9.gif
953 ms
y10.gif
937 ms
y11.gif
924 ms
y12.gif
924 ms
s12.gif
952 ms
s2.gif
941 ms
s3.gif
932 ms
s4.gif
864 ms
s5.gif
860 ms
s6.gif
922 ms
s7.gif
829 ms
s8.gif
828 ms
s9.gif
738 ms
s10.gif
739 ms
s11.gif
691 ms
s1.gif
731 ms
a1.gif
687 ms
a2.gif
640 ms
a3.gif
638 ms
a4.gif
630 ms
a5.gif
643 ms
a6.gif
628 ms
footerbg.png
888 ms
txtelite.com SEO score
ZH
N/A
GB2312
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Txtelite.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Txtelite.com main page’s claimed encoding is gb2312. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
txtelite.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Txtelite. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: