Tools & Wizards About Us
typecraft.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

typecraft.co.uk

Typecraft - Print. It's what we're about.

Page Load Speed

2.3 sec in total

First Response

207 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

935 ms

typecraft.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Typecraft content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about typecraft.co.uk

Typecraft are a printing company in Cheltenham, Gloucestershire that specialise in Large Format, Digital & Litho printing. Cotswold Printing

Visit typecraft.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Typecraft.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

typecraft.co.uk performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.3 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

typecraft.co.uk

207 ms

typecraft.co.uk

153 ms

autoptimize_bddbba23517ddce67f7f51c4dd5c9069.css

24 ms

jquery.min.js

36 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

41 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (26 requests) were addressed to the original Typecraft.co.uk, 7% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (544 ms) belongs to the original domain Typecraft.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 32.9 kB (13%)

Content Size

244.5 kB

After Optimization

211.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Typecraft.co.uk main page is 244.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 94.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 32.8 kB

  • Original 40.0 kB
  • After minification 35.9 kB
  • After compression 7.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 63.5 kB
  • After minification 63.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Typecraft images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 38 B

  • Original 94.9 kB
  • After minification 94.9 kB
  • After compression 94.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 46.1 kB
  • After minification 46.1 kB
  • After compression 46.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Typecraft.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (38%)

Requests Now

24

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Typecraft. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

typecraft.co.uk

typecraft.co.uk

207 ms

typecraft.co.uk

typecraft.co.uk

153 ms

autoptimize_bddbba23517ddce67f7f51c4dd5c9069.css

autoptimize_bddbba23517ddce67f7f51c4dd5c9069.css

24 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

36 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

41 ms

moxie.min.js

moxie.min.js

36 ms

plupload.min.js

plupload.min.js

19 ms

lazysizes.min.js

lazysizes.min.js

20 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

36 ms

bootstrap.min.js

bootstrap.min.js

36 ms

siema.min.js

siema.min.js

38 ms

custom-scripts.js

custom-scripts.js

51 ms

css2

css2

34 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

30 ms

grid-bg.svg

grid-bg.svg

79 ms

cmyk.svg

cmyk.svg

76 ms

Recent-Projects-Background.jpg

Recent-Projects-Background.jpg

78 ms

typecraft-logo.svg

typecraft-logo.svg

21 ms

hero-background4.svg

hero-background4.svg

23 ms

typecraft-logo-strap2.svg

typecraft-logo-strap2.svg

15 ms

digital-print.svg

digital-print.svg

16 ms

graphic-design.svg

graphic-design.svg

24 ms

get-a-quote.svg

get-a-quote.svg

21 ms

large-format.svg

large-format.svg

43 ms

litho-print.svg

litho-print.svg

36 ms

upload-your-files.svg

upload-your-files.svg

42 ms

font

font

42 ms

font

font

42 ms

LineIcons.woff

LineIcons.woff

544 ms

Accessibility Review

typecraft.co.uk accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

typecraft.co.uk best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

typecraft.co.uk SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Typecraft.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Typecraft.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

typecraft.co.uk

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Typecraft. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: