3.3 sec in total
895 ms
2.2 sec
243 ms
Visit ww.travelpedia.de now to see the best up-to-date Ww Travel Pedia content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ww.travelpedia.de
Visit ww.travelpedia.deWe analyzed Ww.travelpedia.de page load time and found that the first response time was 895 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ww.travelpedia.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
98/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
895 ms
189 ms
299 ms
372 ms
188 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Ww.travelpedia.de, 28% (16 requests) were made to Travelpedia.de and 5% (3 requests) were made to Images.traveltainment.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (895 ms) belongs to the original domain Ww.travelpedia.de.
Page size can be reduced by 240.7 kB (60%)
400.4 kB
159.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Ww.travelpedia.de main page is 400.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 171.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 62.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.0 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ww Travel Pedia images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 125.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 125.8 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ww.travelpedia.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (71%)
56
16
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ww Travel Pedia. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
index.php
895 ms
style_main.css
189 ms
style.css
299 ms
ibe_v2.css
372 ms
openhbox.js
188 ms
ttafh_dlc_866000.js
188 ms
style_afh.css
189 ms
all_07_01_23.js
280 ms
cachefiles_654_js.php
343 ms
ttibe.js
278 ms
suchelmps.js
281 ms
configAirportMultiChoice.js
195 ms
THB_999_H2291.jpg
274 ms
THB_999_H64734.jpg
278 ms
THB_999_H1246.jpg
278 ms
1stern.gif
105 ms
stern_halb.gif
102 ms
bg_high_left.gif
107 ms
bg_high_right.gif
106 ms
abflughafen.gif
104 ms
spacer.gif
160 ms
kalender.gif
191 ms
1stern.gif
192 ms
start
210 ms
hg3.gif
115 ms
heads.jpg
386 ms
de_small.png
219 ms
at_small.png
219 ms
ch_small.png
219 ms
bg-nav.gif
227 ms
tab-between-left.gif
228 ms
navbut.gif
306 ms
navbutbetween.gif
312 ms
navbutaktiv.gif
315 ms
tab-between-right.gif
336 ms
muschel.jpg
490 ms
facebook.png
406 ms
twitter.png
416 ms
feed.png
426 ms
termine_654_1458189175.js
94 ms
regionen_654_1458189175.js
279 ms
selectopt654.js
138 ms
datehelper.js
120 ms
zeitraum.js
182 ms
terminauswahl.js
214 ms
formbase.js
329 ms
reisende.js
377 ms
zielauswahl.js
217 ms
index.php
854 ms
lami_form_bg1.gif
248 ms
lami_form_bg2.gif
279 ms
gtm.js
49 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
ec.js
10 ms
collect
4 ms
collect
56 ms
ga-audiences
33 ms
angebote_finden.gif
96 ms
ww.travelpedia.de accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
ww.travelpedia.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
ww.travelpedia.de SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
N/A
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ww.travelpedia.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ww.travelpedia.de main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
ww.travelpedia.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ww Travel Pedia. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: