1.7 sec in total
92 ms
1.3 sec
275 ms
Visit eco.umass.edu now to see the best up-to-date Eco UMass content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eco.umass.edu
Environmental Conservation at UMass Amherst: Sustainability in fish and wildlife ecology, forestry, water, landscapes, urban environment, green buildings and construction. Offers Bachelor, Master'...
Visit eco.umass.eduWe analyzed Eco.umass.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 92 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
eco.umass.edu performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
4/100
10%
Value16.3 s
0/100
25%
Value9.3 s
13/100
10%
Value600 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.429
23/100
15%
Value16.6 s
5/100
10%
92 ms
21 ms
141 ms
35 ms
35 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Eco.umass.edu, 18% (13 requests) were made to I1.rgstatic.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (937 ms) belongs to the original domain Eco.umass.edu.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (40%)
2.5 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Eco.umass.edu main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 48.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.0 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 310.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Eco UMass needs image optimization as it can save up to 310.3 kB or 21% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 363.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 363.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 283.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eco.umass.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 283.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (31%)
72
50
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eco UMass. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eco.umass.edu
92 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
21 ms
ai1ec_parsed_css.css
141 ms
sem-external-links.css
35 ms
styles.css
35 ms
thickbox.min.css
36 ms
jquery.js
80 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
42 ms
thickbox.min.js
66 ms
external-tracking.min.js
51 ms
buttons.js
10 ms
style.css
51 ms
jquery-ui.css
55 ms
jquery.innerfade.js
64 ms
main.js
66 ms
jquery.form.min.js
71 ms
scripts.js
78 ms
wp-embed.min.js
81 ms
core.min.js
83 ms
widget.min.js
87 ms
tabs.min.js
90 ms
eco.umass.edu
937 ms
ga.js
50 ms
css
110 ms
__utm.gif
15 ms
__utm.gif
96 ms
mar-wordmark.gif
99 ms
rss_32.png
92 ms
department
403 ms
facebook_32.png
73 ms
twitter_32.png
74 ms
youtube_32.png
75 ms
back-collage-lt.png
80 ms
background.gif
74 ms
topimage7.jpg
78 ms
slideshow1.jpg
221 ms
slideshow2.jpg
76 ms
slideshow3.jpg
78 ms
slideshow4.jpg
78 ms
slideshow5.jpg
81 ms
slideshow6.jpg
80 ms
slideshow7.jpg
93 ms
slideshow8.jpg
93 ms
slideshow9.jpg
92 ms
slideshow10.jpg
94 ms
slideshow11.jpg
106 ms
slideshow12.jpg
105 ms
slideshow13.jpg
111 ms
slideshow14.jpg
112 ms
slideshow15.jpg
124 ms
Cree-Culture-group-photo-resized-300x161.jpg
126 ms
2015_BCT_js_MG_3656-100x100.jpg
131 ms
manoa_falls_th.jpg
130 ms
IMG_0771_3_th.jpg
143 ms
arboriculture-100x100.jpg
144 ms
contact_advisor_150.jpg
147 ms
logo.jpg
145 ms
wsmC9pGAAAAAAFSd7nXAAA=
4 ms
AS%3A271410390339589%401441720687879_m
65 ms
Todd_Fuller.png
58 ms
Andy_Danylchuk.png
64 ms
B_Kynard.png
68 ms
Timothy_Randhir.png
63 ms
Michelle_Staudinger.png
70 ms
Michael_Bank2.png
71 ms
John_Finn4.png
67 ms
Buuveibaatar_Bayarbaatar.png
74 ms
Bethany_Bradley.png
71 ms
Sandra_Haire.png
73 ms
George_Boettner.png
75 ms
Susannah_Lerman.png
76 ms
favicon.ico
33 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
26 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
24 ms
eco.umass.edu accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
eco.umass.edu best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
eco.umass.edu SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eco.umass.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Eco.umass.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eco.umass.edu
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eco UMass. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: