Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

m.umb.com

Home | UMB Bank

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

77 ms

Resources Loaded

846 ms

Page Rendered

449 ms

m.umb.com screenshot

About Website

Visit m.umb.com now to see the best up-to-date M UMB content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about m.umb.com

Visit m.umb.com

Key Findings

We analyzed M.umb.com page load time and found that the first response time was 77 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

m.umb.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value23.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value20.0 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value14,080 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value30.7 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.umb.com

77 ms

gtm.js

165 ms

ljok7biums

152 ms

lift.js

42 ms

css

88 ms

Our browser made a total of 184 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original M.umb.com, 2% (4 requests) were made to S.swiftypecdn.com and 2% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (165 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 304.8 kB (13%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of M.umb.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 191.8 kB

  • Original 223.2 kB
  • After minification 220.0 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.8 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 21.6 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. M UMB images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 24.1 kB

  • Original 346.3 kB
  • After minification 346.0 kB
  • After compression 322.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-42%

Potential reduce by 67.3 kB

  • Original 160.5 kB
  • After minification 159.2 kB
  • After compression 93.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. M.umb.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 67.3 kB or 42% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 144 (80%)

Requests Now

180

After Optimization

36

The browser has sent 180 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of M UMB. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 91 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 47 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

m.umb.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

m.umb.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

m.umb.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise M.umb.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that M.umb.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of M UMB. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: