Tools & Wizards About Us
ssd.userbenchmark.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 50

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    18% of websites

ssd.userbenchmark.com

SSD UserBenchmarks - 1080 Solid State Drives Compared

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

207 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

570 ms

ssd.userbenchmark.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing SSD User Benchmark content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ssd.userbenchmark.com

Visit ssd.userbenchmark.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ssd.userbenchmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 207 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ssd.userbenchmark.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.4 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

64/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,970 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.016

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value16.6 s

5/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ssd.userbenchmark.com

207 ms

css

49 ms

font-awesome.min.css

49 ms

userbenchmark.css

1108 ms

js

80 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Ssd.userbenchmark.com, 26% (9 requests) were made to Static.userbenchmark.com and 24% (8 requests) were made to Userbenchmark.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Userbenchmark.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 315.2 kB (35%)

Content Size

888.2 kB

After Optimization

573.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ssd.userbenchmark.com main page is 888.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 468.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 240.0 kB

  • Original 274.8 kB
  • After minification 258.2 kB
  • After compression 34.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 240.0 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 48 B

  • Original 111.2 kB
  • After minification 111.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SSD User Benchmark images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 75.1 kB

  • Original 468.9 kB
  • After minification 468.9 kB
  • After compression 393.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 33.2 kB
  • After minification 33.2 kB
  • After compression 33.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ssd.userbenchmark.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (32%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

19

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SSD User Benchmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ssd.userbenchmark.com

ssd.userbenchmark.com

207 ms

css

css

49 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

49 ms

userbenchmark.css

userbenchmark.css

1108 ms

js

js

80 ms

gpt.js

gpt.js

120 ms

jsf.js.xhtml

jsf.js.xhtml

50 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

23 ms

Chart.min.js

Chart.min.js

34 ms

chartjs-plugin-annotation.min.js

chartjs-plugin-annotation.min.js

30 ms

userbenchmark.js

userbenchmark.js

1198 ms

apstag.js

apstag.js

153 ms

WD-SN850X.png

WD-SN850X.png

151 ms

loading-transp.png

loading-transp.png

150 ms

m2.jpg

m2.jpg

338 ms

flame.gif

flame.gif

342 ms

Crucial-T700.png

Crucial-T700.png

150 ms

Samsung-990-Pro.png

Samsung-990-Pro.png

337 ms

Crucial-T705.png

Crucial-T705.png

340 ms

Crucial-MX200.jpg

Crucial-MX200.jpg

338 ms

Samsung-850-Evo.jpg

Samsung-850-Evo.jpg

338 ms

HyperX-Savage.jpg

HyperX-Savage.jpg

338 ms

Samsung-850-Pro.jpg

Samsung-850-Pro.jpg

338 ms

SanDisk-Ultra-II.jpg

SanDisk-Ultra-II.jpg

339 ms

pubads_impl.js

pubads_impl.js

296 ms

flags.png

flags.png

373 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf

234 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf

235 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf

342 ms

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf

343 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

146 ms

74331939

74331939

84 ms

select2.png

select2.png

20 ms

softwareWS.png

softwareWS.png

15 ms

Accessibility Review

ssd.userbenchmark.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ssd.userbenchmark.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ssd.userbenchmark.com SEO score

50

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ssd.userbenchmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ssd.userbenchmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ssd.userbenchmark.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SSD User Benchmark. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: