22.1 sec in total
10.5 sec
11.4 sec
181 ms
Click here to check amazing UAML content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about uaml.in
Visit uaml.inWe analyzed Uaml.in page load time and found that the first response time was 10.5 sec and then it took 11.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Uaml.in rating and web reputation
uaml.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value10.3 s
8/100
10%
Value1,180 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.383
27/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
10531 ms
24 ms
177 ms
234 ms
101 ms
Our browser made a total of 83 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (70 requests) were addressed to the original Uaml.in, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (10.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Uaml.in.
Page size can be reduced by 706.5 kB (41%)
1.7 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Uaml.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 751.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 44.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.4 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UAML images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 333.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 333.2 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 296.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uaml.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 296.9 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (65%)
72
25
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UAML. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
uaml.in
10531 ms
css
24 ms
base.css
177 ms
main.css
234 ms
superfish.css
101 ms
responsive.css
123 ms
fonts.css
102 ms
style.css
100 ms
modernizr-2.6.2.min.js
163 ms
toolbar.css
148 ms
style.css
256 ms
styles.css
189 ms
prettyPhoto.css
192 ms
jplayer.css
227 ms
custom.css
218 ms
layerslider.css
264 ms
cuteslider.css
249 ms
jquery-1.8.1.min.js
308 ms
flags.js
282 ms
toolbar.js
276 ms
load-toolbar.js
285 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
330 ms
overwrite.css
305 ms
element.js
47 ms
flexslider.css
297 ms
jquery.form.min.js
321 ms
scripts.js
320 ms
plugins.js
321 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
325 ms
superfish.js
320 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
360 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
343 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
345 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
360 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
358 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.1.0-packed.js
387 ms
script.js
381 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
482 ms
jquerytransit.js
399 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
363 ms
cute.slider.js
485 ms
cute.transitions.all.js
482 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
461 ms
jquery.flexslider.manualDirectionControls.js
438 ms
script.js
439 ms
custom.css
264 ms
flags18.png
270 ms
fb.png
271 ms
google.png
271 ms
images.jpg
271 ms
UAML.jpg
292 ms
usha-logo.jpg
269 ms
16.jpg
340 ms
23.jpg
289 ms
43.jpg
340 ms
3.png
349 ms
17.jpg
339 ms
24.jpg
365 ms
34.jpg
347 ms
46.jpg
390 ms
25.jpg
369 ms
35.jpg
349 ms
s1.jpg
397 ms
images1.jpg
385 ms
opensans-400.woff
412 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
6 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
22 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
24 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
24 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
23 ms
opensans-300.woff
409 ms
opensans-600.woff
392 ms
opensans-700.woff
412 ms
translateelement.css
57 ms
main.js
126 ms
certificate-all.jpg
468 ms
scrolltop.png
433 ms
flags.png
256 ms
element_main.js
37 ms
translate_24dp.png
35 ms
l
47 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
32 ms
slider-circle-arrows.png
155 ms
uaml.in accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
uaml.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
uaml.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Uaml.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Uaml.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
uaml.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of UAML. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: