5 sec in total
624 ms
4.2 sec
167 ms
Visit ulezchecker.com now to see the best up-to-date ULEZ Checker content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ulezchecker.com
ULEZ Checker - Check if your vehicle is ULEZ Compliant by entering the vehicle registration number. Find out about the ULEZ 2021, ULEZ Extension.
Visit ulezchecker.comWe analyzed Ulezchecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 624 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ulezchecker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value11.2 s
0/100
25%
Value12.8 s
2/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.143
78/100
15%
Value17.8 s
4/100
10%
624 ms
40 ms
130 ms
244 ms
438 ms
Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (55 requests) were addressed to the original Ulezchecker.com, 13% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ulezchecker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 568.3 kB (56%)
1.0 MB
454.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Ulezchecker.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 733.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization.
Potential reduce by 450.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 450.8 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 58.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ulezchecker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 58.0 kB or 29% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (87%)
71
9
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of ULEZ Checker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ulezchecker.com
624 ms
jquery-3.3.1.js
40 ms
themify-icons.css
130 ms
elementor-edit.css
244 ms
style.min.css
438 ms
classic-themes.min.css
338 ms
extendify-utilities.css
337 ms
styles.css
379 ms
bootstrap.css
476 ms
bootstrap-rtl.css
445 ms
font-awesome.min.css
453 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.min.css
455 ms
swiper.min.css
495 ms
linearicons.css
553 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
569 ms
animate.css
571 ms
magnific-popup.css
570 ms
css
119 ms
wpd-style.css
596 ms
comments.css
607 ms
style.css
740 ms
responsive.css
692 ms
style.css
705 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
684 ms
animations.min.css
712 ms
frontend.min.css
753 ms
global.css
795 ms
post-1651.css
804 ms
css
120 ms
jquery.min.js
1048 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
848 ms
js
147 ms
css
126 ms
sharethis.js
110 ms
adsbygoogle.js
189 ms
cawshow.php
473 ms
index.js
859 ms
index.js
888 ms
tether.min.js
942 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1007 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
970 ms
smooth-scroll.min.js
979 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1153 ms
jquery.sticky.js
1152 ms
sckroller.js
1153 ms
wow.min.js
1037 ms
css
13 ms
parallax-scroll.js
924 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
968 ms
particles.min.js
965 ms
custom.js
924 ms
custom-wp.js
863 ms
frontend-modules.js
942 ms
core.min.js
929 ms
dialog.min.js
1152 ms
waypoints.min.js
1177 ms
swiper.jquery.min.js
1302 ms
frontend.min.js
1045 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
959 ms
ulezchecker_x2w.png
440 ms
ulezchecker_x2b.png
558 ms
show_ads_impl.js
241 ms
zrt_lookup.html
61 ms
js
106 ms
analytics.js
71 ms
uknumberplate-webfont.ttf
519 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf
90 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEA.ttf
171 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEA.ttf
250 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEA.ttf
250 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEA.ttf
249 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
248 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
248 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
248 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
251 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
310 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
310 ms
bundle.js
331 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
727 ms
collect
164 ms
iframe_api
184 ms
collect
115 ms
ads
497 ms
www-widgetapi.js
15 ms
frontend-msie.min.css
181 ms
ulezchecker.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
ulezchecker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ulezchecker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ulezchecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ulezchecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ulezchecker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of ULEZ Checker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: