9.6 sec in total
803 ms
7.7 sec
1.1 sec
Visit ultimate-finishes.com now to see the best up-to-date Ultimate Finishes content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ultimate-finishes.com
Visit ultimate-finishes.comWe analyzed Ultimate-finishes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 803 ms and then it took 8.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ultimate-finishes.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.1 s
1/100
10%
Value14.2 s
0/100
25%
Value17.9 s
0/100
10%
Value360 ms
72/100
30%
Value0.611
10/100
15%
Value16.1 s
6/100
10%
803 ms
973 ms
726 ms
967 ms
1451 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (57 requests) were addressed to the original Ultimate-finishes.com, 22% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Ultimate-finishes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (32%)
3.4 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Ultimate-finishes.com main page is 3.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.3 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 496.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ultimate Finishes needs image optimization as it can save up to 496.8 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 574.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 574.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (70%)
54
16
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultimate Finishes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ultimate-finishes.com
803 ms
all.min.css
973 ms
elegenticons.css
726 ms
animate.min.css
967 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1451 ms
bootstrap-select.min.css
493 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
536 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
907 ms
perfect-scrollbar.css
915 ms
slick.css
1134 ms
style.css
1941 ms
responsive.css
1478 ms
color.css
1356 ms
settings.css
1519 ms
layers.css
2323 ms
navigation.css
2121 ms
slide2-mckp1.jpg
2439 ms
slide2-shape1.png
2057 ms
about-mckp2.png
3316 ms
port-img2-1.jpg
2562 ms
port-img2-4.jpg
2756 ms
port-img2-2.jpg
2800 ms
port-img2-5.jpg
3113 ms
port-img2-3.jpg
2981 ms
about-mckp2.jpg
3707 ms
testi-img1-1.jpg
3320 ms
testi-img1-2.jpg
3818 ms
testi-img1-3.jpg
3630 ms
jquery.min.js
4016 ms
popper.min.js
3831 ms
bootstrap.min.js
4052 ms
bootstrap-select.min.js
4368 ms
wow.min.js
4099 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
4488 ms
counterup.min.js
4397 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
4691 ms
perfect-scrollbar.min.js
4240 ms
slick.min.js
4403 ms
custom-scripts.js
4173 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
4504 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
4435 ms
revolution.extension.actions.min.js
4159 ms
revolution.extension.carousel.min.js
4245 ms
revolution.extension.kenburn.min.js
4183 ms
revolution.extension.layeranimation.min.js
4301 ms
revolution.extension.migration.min.js
4216 ms
revolution.extension.navigation.min.js
4273 ms
revolution.extension.parallax.min.js
4195 ms
css2
39 ms
css2
57 ms
revolution.extension.slideanims.min.js
3943 ms
revolution.extension.video.min.js
3887 ms
revolution-init.js
3929 ms
pattern-bg2.jpg
4578 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkHkz.woff
31 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFn8kHkz.woff
41 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkHkz.woff
43 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOkHkz.woff
41 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl3kz.woff
43 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl3kz.woff
41 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlOl3kz.woff
44 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl3kz.woff
44 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM70w9.woff
71 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr70w9.woff
71 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC70w9.woff
70 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu170w9.woff
72 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Ew9.woff
72 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Ew9.woff
73 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Ew9.woff
75 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Ew9.woff
73 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Uw9.woff
73 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
4150 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
3644 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
3735 ms
post-img2-4.jpg
3923 ms
revicons.woff
437 ms
ultimate-finishes.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
ultimate-finishes.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
ultimate-finishes.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultimate-finishes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultimate-finishes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ultimate-finishes.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultimate Finishes. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: