Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

196 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

ultimatealternatives.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ultimatealternatives content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ultimatealternatives.com

Visit ultimatealternatives.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultimatealternatives.com page load time and found that the first response time was 196 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultimatealternatives.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.9 s

95/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.007

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ultimatealternatives.com

196 ms

shatterproofyourmarriage.com

607 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

164 ms

social_widget.css

128 ms

css

71 ms

Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ultimatealternatives.com, 40% (41 requests) were made to Shatterproofyourmarriage.com and 11% (11 requests) were made to Pbs.twimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Shatterproofyourmarriage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 701.6 kB (26%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

2.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Ultimatealternatives.com main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 119.9 kB

  • Original 151.3 kB
  • After minification 148.7 kB
  • After compression 31.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 371.5 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ultimatealternatives needs image optimization as it can save up to 371.5 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 143.2 kB

  • Original 228.7 kB
  • After minification 227.1 kB
  • After compression 85.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 143.2 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 67.0 kB

  • Original 97.1 kB
  • After minification 79.4 kB
  • After compression 30.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultimatealternatives.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 67.0 kB or 69% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 38 (42%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

52

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultimatealternatives. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ultimatealternatives.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

ultimatealternatives.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ultimatealternatives.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultimatealternatives.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Ultimatealternatives.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultimatealternatives. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: