Tools & Wizards About Us
ultra-filter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

ultra-filter.com

Buy filters - Compressed air, liquid, gas, water & more

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

558 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

74 ms

ultra-filter.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ultra-filter.com now to see the best up-to-date Ultra Filter content for Latvia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ultra-filter.com

At Ultrafilter we have a wide range of filtration products for compressed air, process and water +45 82 30 30 20

Visit ultra-filter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultra-filter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 558 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultra-filter.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

12/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

43/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value380 ms

70/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.4 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ultra-filter.com

558 ms

js

80 ms

gtm.js

124 ms

71e5b38a1e7d2d13b9a2429e7.js

251 ms

0ffbd374e0e52b8cda69366c159e7140.cache.css

779 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 29% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Ultra-filter.com, 43% (6 requests) were made to Webresources.jit.nu and 14% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (790 ms) relates to the external source Webresources.jit.nu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 45.5 kB (21%)

Content Size

219.0 kB

After Optimization

173.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ultra-filter.com main page is 219.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 205.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 5.3 kB
  • After minification 4.9 kB
  • After compression 1.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 3.4 kB or 64% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.3 kB
  • After minification 4.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultra Filter images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 40.5 kB

  • Original 205.3 kB
  • After minification 205.2 kB
  • After compression 164.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 40.5 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultra-filter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.6 kB or 39% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (77%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

3

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultra Filter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ultra-filter.com

www.ultra-filter.com

558 ms

js

js

80 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

124 ms

71e5b38a1e7d2d13b9a2429e7.js

71e5b38a1e7d2d13b9a2429e7.js

251 ms

0ffbd374e0e52b8cda69366c159e7140.cache.css

0ffbd374e0e52b8cda69366c159e7140.cache.css

779 ms

20240531133031002024053113303100.cache.css

20240531133031002024053113303100.cache.css

790 ms

_shared.css

_shared.css

516 ms

ultra-filter_com_9.0.8.css

ultra-filter_com_9.0.8.css

107 ms

search_chaindselects_9.0.8_5.js

search_chaindselects_9.0.8_5.js

173 ms

main.js

main.js

789 ms

token.AddToBasket.js

token.AddToBasket.js

607 ms

embed.js

embed.js

25 ms

2655.jpg

2655.jpg

357 ms

min.js

min.js

92 ms

Accessibility Review

ultra-filter.com accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a valid value for its [lang] attribute.

Best Practices

ultra-filter.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

ultra-filter.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    US

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultra-filter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultra-filter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ultra-filter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultra Filter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: