Report Summary

  • 73

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

ultraedit.com

UltraEdit Text Editor + Coding Software

Page Load Speed

3.6 sec in total

First Response

138 ms

Resources Loaded

3 sec

Page Rendered

516 ms

ultraedit.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Ultra Edit content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ultraedit.com

Home of UltraEdit, the powerful text and hex editor for Windows, Mac, and Linux, as well as UltraCompare, UltraFinder, and UltraFTP.

Visit ultraedit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultraedit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 138 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultraedit.com performance score

73

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.6 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,230 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.3 s

94/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ultraedit.com

138 ms

font-awesome.min.css

37 ms

app.css

133 ms

modernizr.js

92 ms

jquery-1.11.1.min.js

39 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Ultraedit.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to and 3% (2 requests) were made to Maxcdn.bootstrapcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Ultraedit.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (55%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

892.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Ultraedit.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 59.7 kB

  • Original 72.9 kB
  • After minification 63.0 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.9 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-38%

Potential reduce by 442.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 725.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ultra Edit needs image optimization as it can save up to 442.0 kB or 38% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 232.7 kB

  • Original 342.7 kB
  • After minification 326.5 kB
  • After compression 110.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 232.7 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 357.5 kB

  • Original 401.6 kB
  • After minification 394.9 kB
  • After compression 44.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultraedit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 357.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (37%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultra Edit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

ultraedit.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

SEO Factors

ultraedit.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultraedit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultraedit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultra Edit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: