Tools & Wizards About Us
ultraflovalve.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

ultraflovalve.com

Home - Butterfly Valves, Actuators, and Controls | Ultraflo

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

330 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

130 ms

ultraflovalve.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ultraflovalve.com now to see the best up-to-date Ultraflo Valve content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ultraflovalve.com

Ultraflo Corporation was founded on the premise that a quality product which is readily available and offered with good customer service would create opportunity and customer loyalty.

Visit ultraflovalve.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultraflovalve.com page load time and found that the first response time was 330 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultraflovalve.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.8 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.8 s

28/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.ultraflovalve.com

330 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

55 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

60 ms

style.min.css

74 ms

theme.min.css

308 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Ultraflovalve.com, 20% (11 requests) were made to C0.wp.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (591 ms) belongs to the original domain Ultraflovalve.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 80.2 kB (25%)

Content Size

321.1 kB

After Optimization

240.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ultraflovalve.com main page is 321.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 174.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 46.1 kB

  • Original 57.5 kB
  • After minification 55.9 kB
  • After compression 11.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 4.4 kB
  • After minification 4.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultraflo Valve images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-12%

Potential reduce by 21.2 kB

  • Original 174.2 kB
  • After minification 174.2 kB
  • After compression 153.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 21.2 kB or 12% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 12.9 kB

  • Original 85.0 kB
  • After minification 85.0 kB
  • After compression 72.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultraflovalve.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 15% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (89%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultraflo Valve. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.ultraflovalve.com

www.ultraflovalve.com

330 ms

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css

55 ms

wp-mediaelement.min.css

wp-mediaelement.min.css

60 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

74 ms

theme.min.css

theme.min.css

308 ms

header-footer.min.css

header-footer.min.css

310 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

386 ms

post-5.css

post-5.css

323 ms

elementor-icons.min.css

elementor-icons.min.css

292 ms

swiper.min.css

swiper.min.css

147 ms

frontend-lite.min.css

frontend-lite.min.css

223 ms

global.css

global.css

300 ms

post-34.css

post-34.css

368 ms

css

css

70 ms

fontawesome.min.css

fontawesome.min.css

391 ms

solid.min.css

solid.min.css

382 ms

regular.min.css

regular.min.css

382 ms

jetpack.css

jetpack.css

60 ms

widget-icon-box.min.css

widget-icon-box.min.css

419 ms

widget-nav-menu.min.css

widget-nav-menu.min.css

441 ms

widget-icon-list.min.css

widget-icon-list.min.css

453 ms

image-cdn.js

image-cdn.js

535 ms

hello-frontend.min.js

hello-frontend.min.js

534 ms

e-202408.js

e-202408.js

66 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

57 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

57 ms

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

jquery.smartmenus.min.js

490 ms

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

webpack-pro.runtime.min.js

490 ms

webpack.runtime.min.js

webpack.runtime.min.js

546 ms

frontend-modules.min.js

frontend-modules.min.js

591 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

61 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

61 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

62 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

62 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

63 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

565 ms

waypoints.min.js

waypoints.min.js

565 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

62 ms

frontend.min.js

frontend.min.js

565 ms

elements-handlers.min.js

elements-handlers.min.js

566 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

93 ms

ultraflo-logo.png

ultraflo-logo.png

83 ms

ultraflo-logo-1.png

ultraflo-logo-1.png

86 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

26 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

67 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

68 ms

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf

71 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf

69 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf

70 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

232 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

196 ms

js

js

56 ms

fjzoxx39nq

fjzoxx39nq

56 ms

clarity.js

clarity.js

5 ms

c.gif

c.gif

11 ms

Accessibility Review

ultraflovalve.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ultraflovalve.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ultraflovalve.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultraflovalve.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultraflovalve.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ultraflovalve.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ultraflo Valve. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: