2.1 sec in total
418 ms
1.6 sec
100 ms
Visit ultrapic.net now to see the best up-to-date Ultrapic content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ultrapic.net
бесплатный фотохостинг без рекламы без регистрации
Visit ultrapic.netWe analyzed Ultrapic.net page load time and found that the first response time was 418 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
ultrapic.net performance score
418 ms
471 ms
193 ms
198 ms
201 ms
Our browser made a total of 26 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Ultrapic.net, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 8% (2 requests) were made to Mc.yandex.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (566 ms) relates to the external source Mc.yandex.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 145.2 kB (58%)
250.1 kB
104.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Ultrapic.net main page is 250.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 187.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.1 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ultrapic needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 22% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 111.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 111.5 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultrapic.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (46%)
24
13
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultrapic. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ultrapic.net
418 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
471 ms
jquery.toastmessage.js
193 ms
jquery.selectbox.js
198 ms
system.css
201 ms
common.css
203 ms
jquery.toastmessage.css
204 ms
header.css
288 ms
footer.css
295 ms
main.css
298 ms
main.css
303 ms
selectbox.css
303 ms
ga.js
19 ms
body_bg.png
100 ms
logo.png
96 ms
devider_main_menu.png
107 ms
shadow_up.png
108 ms
gray_cells_bg.png
101 ms
input_shadow.png
102 ms
orange_cells_bg.png
190 ms
shadow_down.png
198 ms
load_button_bg.png
199 ms
footer_bg.png
193 ms
watch.js
183 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
watch.js
566 ms
ultrapic.net SEO score
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultrapic.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Ultrapic.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ultrapic.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultrapic. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: