Tools & Wizards About Us
ultrapolishing.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 96

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    90% of websites

ultrapolishing.com

Ultra Polishing | Injection Mold Polishing | Home Page

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

796 ms

Page Rendered

314 ms

ultrapolishing.com screenshot

About Website

Visit ultrapolishing.com now to see the best up-to-date Ultra Polishing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ultrapolishing.com

Whether your mold requires a uniform stoned finish, an optical-quality diamond polish, or anything in between, Ultra Polishing has the tools, skills and experience.

Visit ultrapolishing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultrapolishing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultrapolishing.com performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.222

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.5 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ultrapolishing.com

66 ms

www.ultrapolishing.com

405 ms

eventgallery.css

29 ms

content.min.css

42 ms

nucleus.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ultrapolishing.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Cdn.gtranslate.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (405 ms) belongs to the original domain Ultrapolishing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (41%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ultrapolishing.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 44.7 kB

  • Original 56.6 kB
  • After minification 46.4 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 44.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultra Polishing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 569.7 kB

  • Original 776.4 kB
  • After minification 776.4 kB
  • After compression 206.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 569.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 585.4 kB

  • Original 689.3 kB
  • After minification 631.0 kB
  • After compression 103.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultrapolishing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 585.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (69%)

Requests Now

35

After Optimization

11

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 35 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultra Polishing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ultrapolishing.com

ultrapolishing.com

66 ms

www.ultrapolishing.com

www.ultrapolishing.com

405 ms

eventgallery.css

eventgallery.css

29 ms

content.min.css

content.min.css

42 ms

nucleus.css

nucleus.css

56 ms

aurora_10.css

aurora_10.css

91 ms

bootstrap5.css

bootstrap5.css

97 ms

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

joomla-fontawesome.min.css

69 ms

debug.css

debug.css

47 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

54 ms

aurora-joomla_10.css

aurora-joomla_10.css

75 ms

custom_10.css

custom_10.css

65 ms

animate.css

animate.css

79 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

77 ms

validate.min.js

validate.min.js

81 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

109 ms

jquery-noconflict.min.js

jquery-noconflict.min.js

96 ms

eventgallery.js

eventgallery.js

119 ms

fd.js

fd.js

39 ms

jquery-ui.min.js

jquery-ui.min.js

31 ms

js

js

72 ms

smartslider.min.css

smartslider.min.css

107 ms

css

css

44 ms

n2.min.js

n2.min.js

107 ms

smartslider-frontend.min.js

smartslider-frontend.min.js

203 ms

ss-simple.min.js

ss-simple.min.js

118 ms

w-arrow-image.min.js

w-arrow-image.min.js

172 ms

main.js

main.js

193 ms

Ultra-Logo.png

Ultra-Logo.png

34 ms

TS3_9049-Ultra.jpg

TS3_9049-Ultra.jpg

35 ms

PL1_9808.jpg

PL1_9808.jpg

40 ms

PL2_8820.MOV.03_47_58_09.Still001.jpg

PL2_8820.MOV.03_47_58_09.Still001.jpg

39 ms

PL1_8545.jpg

PL1_8545.jpg

40 ms

TS5_5107-Ultra.jpg

TS5_5107-Ultra.jpg

34 ms

TS7_4769-Ultra.jpg

TS7_4769-Ultra.jpg

37 ms

TS5_5082-Ultra.jpg

TS5_5082-Ultra.jpg

39 ms

QAS-New1.gif

QAS-New1.gif

38 ms

muli-regular-webfont.woff

muli-regular-webfont.woff

34 ms

muli-light-webfont.woff

muli-light-webfont.woff

34 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

14 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

21 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf

21 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf

40 ms

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf

47 ms

Accessibility Review

ultrapolishing.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

ultrapolishing.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

ultrapolishing.com SEO score

96

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultrapolishing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultrapolishing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ultrapolishing.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultra Polishing. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: