Tools & Wizards About Us
ultrasurf.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

ultrasurf.com

ultrasurf.com - This website is for sale! - anonymous surfing Resources and Information.

Page Load Speed

1.2 sec in total

First Response

266 ms

Resources Loaded

774 ms

Page Rendered

204 ms

ultrasurf.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ultrasurf.com homepage info - get ready to check Ultrasurf best content right away, or after learning these important things about ultrasurf.com

This website is for sale! ultrasurf.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, ultrasurf.com ha...

Visit ultrasurf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultrasurf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 266 ms and then it took 978 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultrasurf.com performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

90/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.197

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.0 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ultrasurf.com

266 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

18 ms

caf.js

69 ms

logo_blue.png

174 ms

caf.gif

164 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Ultrasurf.com, 18% (2 requests) were made to Img.sedoparking.com and 18% (2 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (266 ms) belongs to the original domain Ultrasurf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 275.0 kB (58%)

Content Size

476.2 kB

After Optimization

201.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Ultrasurf.com main page is 476.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 445.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 18.8 kB

  • Original 28.5 kB
  • After minification 28.5 kB
  • After compression 9.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.8 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 522 B

  • Original 2.0 kB
  • After minification 1.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ultrasurf needs image optimization as it can save up to 522 B or 26% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 255.6 kB

  • Original 445.6 kB
  • After minification 445.5 kB
  • After compression 190.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 255.6 kB or 57% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (33%)

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultrasurf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ultrasurf.com

ultrasurf.com

266 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

18 ms

caf.js

caf.js

69 ms

logo_blue.png

logo_blue.png

174 ms

caf.gif

caf.gif

164 ms

ads

ads

54 ms

slave.html

slave.html

36 ms

domainpark.cgi

domainpark.cgi

207 ms

async_survey

async_survey

69 ms

prompt_embed_static.js

prompt_embed_static.js

15 ms

bullet_justads.gif

bullet_justads.gif

23 ms

Accessibility Review

ultrasurf.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ultrasurf.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

ultrasurf.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultrasurf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ultrasurf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ultrasurf.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultrasurf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: