Tools & Wizards About Us
um.la screenshot

Report Summary

  • 71

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    81% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

um.la

UM.la ™ - Кращий хостинг для сайтів на Joomla. Автоматична установка Joomla (рос. "Джумла").

Page Load Speed

8.9 sec in total

First Response

843 ms

Resources Loaded

7.7 sec

Page Rendered

357 ms

um.la screenshot

About Website

Visit um.la now to see the best up-to-date UM content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about um.la

Кращий хостинг для Joomla на SSD. Створити сайт на Joomla можна за 5 хвилин. Щоденний Backup. Трафік не обмежений. 14 днів Безкоштовно!

Visit um.la

Key Findings

We analyzed Um.la page load time and found that the first response time was 843 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

um.la performance score

71

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

62/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value360 ms

72/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

um.la

843 ms

styles.css

915 ms

widgets.js

497 ms

openapi.js

2197 ms

plusone.js

542 ms

Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 53% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Um.la, 16% (10 requests) were made to Vk.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Um.la.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 216.8 kB (38%)

Content Size

568.4 kB

After Optimization

351.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Um.la main page is 568.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 283.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 11.3 kB

  • Original 17.2 kB
  • After minification 16.8 kB
  • After compression 5.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.3 kB or 66% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 28.6 kB

  • Original 283.0 kB
  • After minification 254.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UM images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 113.9 kB

  • Original 191.5 kB
  • After minification 157.2 kB
  • After compression 77.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 113.9 kB or 59% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 63.0 kB

  • Original 76.6 kB
  • After minification 63.7 kB
  • After compression 13.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Um.la needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (52%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

29

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UM. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

um.la

um.la

843 ms

styles.css

styles.css

915 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

497 ms

openapi.js

openapi.js

2197 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

542 ms

resets.css

resets.css

1365 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

319 ms

like.php

like.php

423 ms

bg.png

bg.png

977 ms

topline.png

topline.png

811 ms

arr_langs.png

arr_langs.png

651 ms

ico_mail1.png

ico_mail1.png

647 ms

ico_skype1.png

ico_skype1.png

651 ms

ico_phone1.png

ico_phone1.png

1091 ms

ico_login.png

ico_login.png

1206 ms

logo.png

logo.png

1205 ms

green_bg.png

green_bg.png

1207 ms

presenta.png

presenta.png

1553 ms

steps_arr.png

steps_arr.png

1488 ms

contentSep.jpg

contentSep.jpg

1641 ms

simple_install.png

simple_install.png

2046 ms

howitworks.png

howitworks.png

1893 ms

ico1.png

ico1.png

1726 ms

ico2.png

ico2.png

2012 ms

ico3.png

ico3.png

2108 ms

ico4.png

ico4.png

2178 ms

ico5.png

ico5.png

2236 ms

footerContainer.gif

footerContainer.gif

2567 ms

gplus_icon16.png

gplus_icon16.png

2575 ms

fb_icon16.png

fb_icon16.png

2590 ms

twi_icon16.png

twi_icon16.png

2825 ms

vk_icon16.png

vk_icon16.png

3099 ms

bucket_partner.png

bucket_partner.png

3271 ms

bucket_transfer.png

bucket_transfer.png

3117 ms

bucket_components.png

bucket_components.png

3357 ms

lili_hostenko.png

lili_hostenko.png

3623 ms

lili_druhost.png

lili_druhost.png

3648 ms

lili_wordpresso.png

lili_wordpresso.png

3721 ms

upload.gif

upload.gif

172 ms

tp_logo.png

tp_logo.png

3663 ms

widget_subscribe.php

widget_subscribe.php

383 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

216 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

160 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

390 ms

watch.js

watch.js

3 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

542 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

655 ms

Sh_BYjerrZ8.js

Sh_BYjerrZ8.js

660 ms

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

LVx-xkvaJ0b.png

761 ms

loader_nav19239_3.js

loader_nav19239_3.js

185 ms

lite.css

lite.css

340 ms

lite.js

lite.js

988 ms

lang3_0.js

lang3_0.js

496 ms

widget_subscribe.css

widget_subscribe.css

497 ms

xdm.js

xdm.js

510 ms

al_subscribe.js

al_subscribe.js

502 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

332 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

71 ms

collect

collect

69 ms

collect

collect

216 ms

1077434459-postmessagerelay.js

1077434459-postmessagerelay.js

189 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

52 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

242 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

86 ms

Accessibility Review

um.la accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

um.la best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

um.la SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    UK

  • Language Claimed

    RU

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Um.la can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Ukrainian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Um.la main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

um.la

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of UM. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: