3.2 sec in total
79 ms
899 ms
2.3 sec
Visit umdetailing.com now to see the best up-to-date Um Detailing content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about umdetailing.com
Quality focused auto detailing, ceramic coatings & PPF services. We are DRIVEN BY EXCELLENCE to provide services to the Tampa Bay Area, Wesley Chapel, Land O Lakes, Lutz, St. Pete, Clearwater, and Bel...
Visit umdetailing.comWe analyzed Umdetailing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 79 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
umdetailing.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value16.0 s
0/100
25%
Value3.8 s
83/100
10%
Value2,770 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.083
94/100
15%
Value15.9 s
6/100
10%
79 ms
140 ms
51 ms
94 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 21% of them (11 requests) were addressed to the original Umdetailing.com, 33% (17 requests) were made to Static.mywebsites360.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (362 ms) relates to the external source Google.com.
Page size can be reduced by 155.4 kB (5%)
3.3 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Umdetailing.com main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 3.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 123.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Um Detailing images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 323 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (41%)
44
26
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Um Detailing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
umdetailing.com
79 ms
umdetailing.com
140 ms
base
51 ms
page
94 ms
vendor-print
103 ms
custom
100 ms
modernizr.respond.min.js
106 ms
head
111 ms
chat.js
28 ms
jquery-1.12.4.min.js
21 ms
siteBundle.js
145 ms
collections.js
166 ms
gtm.js
154 ms
M_9YRulsrdQ8v7uhW0h6T3SHi38APfmTC8ElZzXQhJCfeljgfO_HJsJ1FQ93wRMhWhja529kwc9UFAF8jRsKFhFy5AmqwDJoFRJuZ2yqw28yeKFudAs8ieBTde80ZkoRdhXCiaiaO1mlZemXjA8C-Ao1OcFzdPJbjAszjcm1jW4ydAN0ZYgkdkJVZe80jhN0Zem0ShmqihmKJysyZeNKZAiyScBldhoqSY4zjcNCZfJAjAszjcm1jW4ydAN0ZYgkdh8XjAUTjkG4fVwXIMMjgfMgH6qJrubbMs6IJMI7fbR3FgMfeMS6MPG4fVJXIMwj2KMgqMYWtO77g6.js
184 ms
um%20header%20for%20square%20-%20Edited2%20%25281%2529.png
185 ms
embed
362 ms
P1000668.jpg
267 ms
P1000668.jpg
265 ms
Blue%20%25281%2529.png
271 ms
Blue.png
160 ms
Services.jpg
160 ms
Ceramic%20Coatings.jpg
161 ms
Detail%20Packages.jpg
260 ms
Glass%20Treatments.jpg
260 ms
Quote.jpg
258 ms
Quote.jpg
260 ms
1fd49d5c7e57b3f6a142710892ec3e7a.png
261 ms
7d7c3018b71aeda989575b21fd3c717a.png
262 ms
6d31d0abf838b226000bfba286ce5a28.png
268 ms
packages%20bg.jpg
268 ms
Untitled%20design%20%252822%2529.png
265 ms
homepage%20hero.jpg
266 ms
zocial.svg
161 ms
kA
3 ms
js
123 ms
loader.js
157 ms
analytics.js
178 ms
destination
242 ms
fbevents.js
174 ms
m360.js
154 ms
d
51 ms
d
137 ms
d
136 ms
d
135 ms
call-tracking_7.js
24 ms
js
88 ms
collect
81 ms
collect
97 ms
umdetailing.com
111 ms
p.gif
48 ms
wcm
13 ms
ga-audiences
24 ms
umdetailing.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
umdetailing.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
umdetailing.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Umdetailing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Umdetailing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
umdetailing.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Um Detailing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: