3.6 sec in total
833 ms
2.2 sec
556 ms
Visit unitpack.com now to see the best up-to-date Unit Pack content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about unitpack.com
We manufacture single-use plastic & foil packaging for commercial industries with pre-production sampling and pilot run services to fit your needs. Call today!
Visit unitpack.comWe analyzed Unitpack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 833 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
unitpack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value11.9 s
0/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value500 ms
58/100
30%
Value0.033
100/100
15%
Value10.8 s
22/100
10%
833 ms
173 ms
365 ms
68 ms
93 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Unitpack.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (833 ms) belongs to the original domain Unitpack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 204.5 kB (9%)
2.2 MB
2.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Unitpack.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.9 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 166.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Unit Pack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 4.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Unitpack.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (37%)
49
31
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Unit Pack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
unitpack.com
833 ms
www.unitpack.com
173 ms
www.unitpack.com
365 ms
plugins.css
68 ms
styles.css
93 ms
responsive.css
99 ms
css
31 ms
jquery.min.js
22 ms
plugins.js
156 ms
scripts.js
114 ms
ajaxupload.min.css
118 ms
apbct_public.js
119 ms
ajaxupload.min.js
123 ms
gtm.js
322 ms
logo.png
88 ms
foil-pouch-banner-2.jpg
137 ms
coin_2x.png
90 ms
fda_registered.png
113 ms
fast_icon_rabbit.png
93 ms
flexible_2x.png
87 ms
otco_organic_white.png
139 ms
bucket.png
194 ms
clean_lub_photo_bucket.d23776920921d45c4b27058755ccceda.jpg
106 ms
single-use-packages.d23776920921d45c4b27058755ccceda.jpg
120 ms
services.d23776920921d45c4b27058755ccceda.jpg
137 ms
team.d23776920921d45c4b27058755ccceda.jpg
147 ms
medical.d23776920921d45c4b27058755ccceda.jpg
154 ms
liquid_pharmaceutical_stock_img.d23776920921d45c4b27058755ccceda.jpg
193 ms
cosmetics.d23776920921d45c4b27058755ccceda.jpg
193 ms
www.unitpack.com
355 ms
exterior_of_building.jpg
258 ms
new_industries_background.jpg
230 ms
purple_tube_1.jpg
269 ms
yellow_tube_crop_1.jpg
269 ms
cosmetics_1.jpg
234 ms
clean_lub_photo_1.jpg
331 ms
footer-green.png
330 ms
foil_pack_on_machine.jpg
332 ms
ajax-loader.gif
330 ms
6xK3dSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3qOK7g.ttf
23 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3i54rwlxdr.ttf
33 ms
6xKydSBYKcSV-LCoeQqfX1RYOo3ig4vwlxdr.ttf
34 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
351 ms
fa-light-300.woff
349 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
387 ms
js
83 ms
bat.js
55 ms
analytics.js
61 ms
hotjar-1297455.js
135 ms
trackatron4.js
70 ms
swap.js
71 ms
linkid.js
43 ms
collect
49 ms
collect
80 ms
collect
44 ms
modules.478d49d6cc21ec95d184.js
60 ms
print.css
39 ms
ga-audiences
75 ms
unitpack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
unitpack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
unitpack.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Unitpack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Unitpack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
unitpack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Unit Pack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: