5.2 sec in total
989 ms
3.9 sec
322 ms
Visit universaldesign.com now to see the best up-to-date Universaldesign content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about universaldesign.com
Visit universaldesign.comWe analyzed Universaldesign.com page load time and found that the first response time was 989 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
universaldesign.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
45/100
10%
Value6.3 s
11/100
25%
Value4.3 s
75/100
10%
Value110 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value7.7 s
45/100
10%
989 ms
297 ms
369 ms
232 ms
299 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Universaldesign.com, 85% (53 requests) were made to Udeworld.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) relates to the external source Udeworld.com.
Page size can be reduced by 622.7 kB (17%)
3.6 MB
3.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Universaldesign.com main page is 3.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.0 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 64.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Universaldesign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 326.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 326.6 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 202.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Universaldesign.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.1 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (63%)
56
21
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Universaldesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.universaldesign.com
989 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
297 ms
bootstrap.custom.min.css
369 ms
public.css
232 ms
cvpro.min.css
299 ms
select2.min.css
237 ms
styles.css
235 ms
hssocial-badges.css
366 ms
general.css
377 ms
wpa-style.css
377 ms
a11y-toolbar.css
432 ms
a11y.css
436 ms
a11y-fontsize.css
501 ms
wmlc_client.css
505 ms
css
25 ms
genericons.css
579 ms
style.css
707 ms
jquery.js
782 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
570 ms
hssocial.js
636 ms
wmljs.js
645 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
774 ms
wp-subscribe.css
598 ms
select2.full.min.js
820 ms
beautiful-taxonomy-filters-public.js
689 ms
jquery.form.min.js
739 ms
scripts.js
739 ms
jquery.scrollto.min.js
788 ms
a11y.js
793 ms
longdesc.button.js
793 ms
masonry.min.js
931 ms
bootstrap.custom.min.js
945 ms
public.js
922 ms
cvpro.min.js
1136 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
943 ms
functions.js
959 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1056 ms
analytics.js
9 ms
collect
33 ms
social-icons.png
404 ms
UDHeaderImage.png
891 ms
UDConference_2016.png
897 ms
gym_cardio-render_MFB_YMCA-672x372.png
903 ms
DD-Cover-672x372.png
884 ms
blaid-opportunity-672x372.jpg
608 ms
ud2016-672x372.jpg
736 ms
IDeACourses-672x372.png
1243 ms
Interaction_B.png
981 ms
PublicBuildings_A-e1448481228454.jpg
1088 ms
Streets_A.png
1227 ms
Housing_A-e1448481240133.jpg
1036 ms
Products_A-e1448481208585.jpg
1043 ms
Transportation_B.png
1264 ms
IDEA_UDConsultants.jpg
1309 ms
ContentContribution.png
1656 ms
pattern-dark.svg
1217 ms
4GwpJM7qx9X5Obd9KsnKxQ.ttf
29 ms
BTu4SsVveqk58cdYjlaM9g.ttf
30 ms
zpv3sOKAbMf4wff105oLjw.ttf
29 ms
5pEc4QKTMA2oB4Hi9NkS4w.ttf
29 ms
VqvVqv1mv0Gr1Gr9Frul7xuyp+V8XvqnTyb1UoNRm4Af+FsAGNAEuwCFBYsQEBjlmxRgYrWCGwEFlLsBRSWCGwgFkdsAYrXFhZsBQrAAAAAVLP0T8AAA==
20 ms
a11y.woff
1304 ms
universaldesign.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
universaldesign.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
universaldesign.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Universaldesign.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Universaldesign.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
universaldesign.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Universaldesign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: