Tools & Wizards About Us
universalimpression.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 27

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    46% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

universalimpression.com

Custom Heat Transfers. | Commerce, CA. | universalimpression.com

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

980 ms

Page Rendered

71 ms

universalimpression.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Universalimpression content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about universalimpression.com

Custom screen printed plastisol heat transfer manufacturing company specializing in high quality products. Choose from a 38″ x 25″ or 40" x 28″ large sheets. Make your design come to life quickly and ...

Visit universalimpression.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Universalimpression.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

universalimpression.com performance score

27

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.universalimpression.com

85 ms

minified.js

42 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

82 ms

polyfill.min.js

36 ms

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

154 ms

Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Universalimpression.com, 48% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 39% (13 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (171 ms) relates to the external source Static.parastorage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 741.5 kB (48%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

817.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Universalimpression.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 777.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 599.8 kB

  • Original 777.4 kB
  • After minification 775.7 kB
  • After compression 177.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 599.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 93.6 kB

  • Original 488.7 kB
  • After minification 395.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Universalimpression needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.6 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 292.8 kB
  • After minification 292.8 kB
  • After compression 244.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (34%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

19

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Universalimpression. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.universalimpression.com

www.universalimpression.com

85 ms

minified.js

minified.js

42 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

82 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

36 ms

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.2ae1974e.bundle.min.js

154 ms

main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js

main.8ce05abc.bundle.min.js

155 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

149 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

154 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

155 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

158 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

171 ms

e32f90_7270996d6ee74ea6ba7340e0162c8a66~mv2.png

e32f90_7270996d6ee74ea6ba7340e0162c8a66~mv2.png

97 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

78 ms

UI%20LOGO.png

UI%20LOGO.png

49 ms

new%20spot%20slide.png

new%20spot%20slide.png

53 ms

e32f90_b964bcc05a3d476bbc55eedd34c71a66~mv2.png

e32f90_b964bcc05a3d476bbc55eedd34c71a66~mv2.png

52 ms

e32f90_48378ee16e63456180e86f0440bac024~mv2.png

e32f90_48378ee16e63456180e86f0440bac024~mv2.png

56 ms

e32f90_ef17485bdabf44b688d27656d7544dec~mv2.png

e32f90_ef17485bdabf44b688d27656d7544dec~mv2.png

54 ms

e32f90_43aaf77f06a64b409afa3b47040e00c9~mv2.png

e32f90_43aaf77f06a64b409afa3b47040e00c9~mv2.png

52 ms

e32f90_07b82f13794246249cb854aecb324823~mv2.png

e32f90_07b82f13794246249cb854aecb324823~mv2.png

53 ms

e32f90_3614f4b8801c414d90430e53641a148f~mv2.png

e32f90_3614f4b8801c414d90430e53641a148f~mv2.png

54 ms

e32f90_6e31d4c0fa7b4494a803aaba325f6cf7~mv2.png

e32f90_6e31d4c0fa7b4494a803aaba325f6cf7~mv2.png

57 ms

e32f90_5f7a28e20df44d608e8bcfd7457bdc77~mv2.png

e32f90_5f7a28e20df44d608e8bcfd7457bdc77~mv2.png

56 ms

e32f90_b8d9a8ececec4740adde8478a4d42836~mv2.png

e32f90_b8d9a8ececec4740adde8478a4d42836~mv2.png

96 ms

UI_Solo_LOGO.png

UI_Solo_LOGO.png

95 ms

shdbottom.3e41aef2.png

shdbottom.3e41aef2.png

43 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

64 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

6 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

37 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

34 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

34 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

34 ms

Accessibility Review

universalimpression.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

universalimpression.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

universalimpression.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Universalimpression.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Universalimpression.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

universalimpression.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Universalimpression. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: