4.5 sec in total
90 ms
3.1 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Upackwe Ship content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about upackweship.com
Visit upackweship.comWe analyzed Upackweship.com page load time and found that the first response time was 90 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
upackweship.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value43.0 s
0/100
25%
Value14.3 s
1/100
10%
Value1,050 ms
25/100
30%
Value0.001
100/100
15%
Value39.7 s
0/100
10%
90 ms
157 ms
67 ms
36 ms
111 ms
Our browser made a total of 165 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Upackweship.com, 90% (148 requests) were made to Upakweship.com and 5% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Upakweship.com.
Page size can be reduced by 358.2 kB (1%)
36.9 MB
36.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Upackweship.com main page is 36.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 36.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 137.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.0 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 221.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Upackwe Ship images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 62 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 134 (89%)
150
16
The browser has sent 150 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Upackwe Ship. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 106 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
upackweship.com
90 ms
157 ms
script.js
67 ms
sbr-styles.css
36 ms
sbi-styles.min.css
111 ms
layerslider.css
130 ms
style.min.css
119 ms
ctf-styles.min.css
113 ms
swiper.min.css
128 ms
style.css
144 ms
wplc-plugin-public.css
115 ms
cff-style.min.css
123 ms
font-awesome.min.css
132 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
178 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
136 ms
style.css
145 ms
font-awesome.min.css
148 ms
style.min.css
158 ms
style.css
168 ms
dripicons.css
171 ms
kiko-all.css
172 ms
font-awesome-5.min.css
176 ms
stylesheet.min.css
228 ms
print.css
190 ms
style_dynamic.css
197 ms
responsive.min.css
206 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
201 ms
js_composer.min.css
294 ms
css
54 ms
core-dashboard.min.css
224 ms
style.css
277 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
281 ms
jquery.min.js
322 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
282 ms
layerslider.utils.js
284 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
320 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
282 ms
rs6.css
281 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
282 ms
masonry.min.js
304 ms
swiper.min.js
297 ms
rbtools.min.js
217 ms
rs6.min.js
241 ms
cff-scripts.min.js
215 ms
core.min.js
217 ms
accordion.min.js
220 ms
menu.min.js
222 ms
dom-ready.min.js
229 ms
hooks.min.js
231 ms
i18n.min.js
234 ms
a11y.min.js
231 ms
autocomplete.min.js
237 ms
controlgroup.min.js
234 ms
checkboxradio.min.js
227 ms
button.min.js
225 ms
datepicker.min.js
225 ms
mouse.min.js
228 ms
resizable.min.js
232 ms
draggable.min.js
232 ms
dialog.min.js
222 ms
droppable.min.js
220 ms
progressbar.min.js
221 ms
selectable.min.js
216 ms
sortable.min.js
209 ms
style.css
162 ms
slider.min.js
157 ms
spinner.min.js
974 ms
tooltip.min.js
973 ms
tabs.min.js
983 ms
effect.min.js
983 ms
effect-blind.min.js
982 ms
effect-bounce.min.js
982 ms
effect-clip.min.js
951 ms
effect-drop.min.js
949 ms
effect-explode.min.js
949 ms
effect-fade.min.js
949 ms
effect-fold.min.js
949 ms
effect-highlight.min.js
948 ms
effect-pulsate.min.js
942 ms
effect-size.min.js
940 ms
effect-scale.min.js
937 ms
effect-shake.min.js
930 ms
effect-slide.min.js
928 ms
effect-transfer.min.js
924 ms
doubletaptogo.js
919 ms
modernizr.min.js
916 ms
jquery.appear.js
911 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
905 ms
counter.js
902 ms
easypiechart.js
901 ms
mixitup.js
893 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
892 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
886 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
881 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
880 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
876 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
869 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
867 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
862 ms
jquery.form.min.js
856 ms
waypoints.min.js
797 ms
gtm.js
199 ms
background.png
160 ms
jplayer.min.js
161 ms
bootstrap.carousel.js
162 ms
skrollr.js
152 ms
Chart.min.js
159 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
151 ms
abstractBaseClass.js
147 ms
jquery.countdown.js
152 ms
jquery.multiscroll.min.js
153 ms
jquery.justifiedGallery.min.js
155 ms
bigtext.js
153 ms
jquery.sticky-kit.min.js
152 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
155 ms
typed.js
155 ms
fluidvids.min.js
154 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.min.js
244 ms
lemmon-slider.min.js
154 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
155 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
154 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
155 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
234 ms
packery-mode.pkgd.min.js
234 ms
jquery.stretch.js
235 ms
imagesloaded.js
235 ms
rangeslider.min.js
235 ms
jquery.event.move.js
235 ms
jquery.twentytwenty.js
344 ms
swiper.min.js
237 ms
TweenLite.min.js
235 ms
smoothPageScroll.min.js
235 ms
default_dynamic.js
235 ms
default.min.js
342 ms
comment-reply.min.js
636 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
338 ms
qode-like.min.js
337 ms
sbi-sprite.png
337 ms
upakweship-us-2021.png
509 ms
Essentials-box-for-first-few-days.png
1028 ms
Family-enjoying-outdoor-activities-in-Australia.png
1022 ms
Various-packing-supplies-including-bubble-wrap-and-cardboard-boxes.png
1019 ms
Illustration-of-a-person-experiencing-a-new-culture.png
726 ms
Cartoon-illustration-of-a-family-enjoying-a-city-break.png
1031 ms
Dutch-landscape-with-windmills-and-tulips.png
1052 ms
Diverse-group-of-colleagues-socializing-after-work.png
1209 ms
London-skyline-with-historic-landmarks-and-modern-buildings.png
1272 ms
Portuguese-national-considering-L1-intra-company-transfer-visa.png
1246 ms
Moving-from-USA-to-France.png
1321 ms
bbb-columbia-upakweship.png
1043 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCGPrQ.ttf
158 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCGPrQ.ttf
160 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCGPrQ.ttf
454 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtaorCGPrQ.ttf
456 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvao7CGPrQ.ttf
460 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCGPrQ.ttf
459 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCGPrQ.ttf
456 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtapbCGPrQ.ttf
459 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCGPrQ.ttf
459 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
1032 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1075 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1087 ms
js
442 ms
analytics.js
436 ms
collect
55 ms
upackweship.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
upackweship.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
upackweship.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upackweship.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Upackweship.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
upackweship.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Upackwe Ship. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: