Tools & Wizards About Us
upass.cc screenshot

Report Summary

  • 63

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    77% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 62

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

991 ms

Resources Loaded

7.2 sec

Page Rendered

123 ms

upass.cc screenshot

About Website

Visit upass.cc now to see the best up-to-date Upass content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about upass.cc

Visit upass.cc

Key Findings

We analyzed Upass.cc page load time and found that the first response time was 991 ms and then it took 7.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

upass.cc performance score

63

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

upass.cc

991 ms

slide.css

645 ms

style.css

638 ms

cufon-yui.js

1275 ms

arial.js

4150 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Upass.cc, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Seal.verisign.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Upass.cc.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 544.6 kB (56%)

Content Size

973.7 kB

After Optimization

429.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Upass.cc main page is 973.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 620.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 27.4 kB

  • Original 32.8 kB
  • After minification 26.4 kB
  • After compression 5.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.4 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-17%

Potential reduce by 51.1 kB

  • Original 308.4 kB
  • After minification 257.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Upass needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 17% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 456.8 kB

  • Original 620.6 kB
  • After minification 605.6 kB
  • After compression 163.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 456.8 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 9.3 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 8.7 kB
  • After compression 2.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Upass.cc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 78% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (25%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

30

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Upass. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

upass.cc

upass.cc

991 ms

slide.css

slide.css

645 ms

style.css

style.css

638 ms

cufon-yui.js

cufon-yui.js

1275 ms

arial.js

arial.js

4150 ms

cuf_run.js

cuf_run.js

647 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

1007 ms

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

jquery-1.4.2.min.js

1916 ms

example.js

example.js

955 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

1925 ms

slide.js

slide.js

1277 ms

crawler.js

crawler.js

1658 ms

getseal

getseal

142 ms

ga.js

ga.js

11 ms

get_flash_player.gif

get_flash_player.gif

11 ms

header_bg.gif

header_bg.gif

325 ms

upass.png

upass.png

633 ms

Act.png

Act.png

337 ms

beam.png

beam.png

331 ms

buldana.png

buldana.png

330 ms

cms.png

cms.png

336 ms

dl.png

dl.png

650 ms

docomo.png

docomo.png

656 ms

gtpl.png

gtpl.png

666 ms

hathwa.png

hathwa.png

659 ms

hindusthan.png

hindusthan.png

675 ms

loop.png

loop.png

1255 ms

nirmal.png

nirmal.png

975 ms

ratnakar.png

ratnakar.png

984 ms

sigma.png

sigma.png

990 ms

tata.png

tata.png

993 ms

virgin.png

virgin.png

1002 ms

Yes.jpg

Yes.jpg

1299 ms

pix1.jpg

pix1.jpg

1305 ms

pix2.jpg

pix2.jpg

2333 ms

pix3.jpg

pix3.jpg

1316 ms

pix4.jpg

pix4.jpg

1331 ms

pix5.jpg

pix5.jpg

1571 ms

pix6.jpg

pix6.jpg

1625 ms

menu_a.gif

menu_a.gif

1624 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

Accessibility Review

upass.cc accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

upass.cc best practices score

62

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

upass.cc SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upass.cc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Upass.cc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

upass.cc

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Upass. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: