Tools & Wizards About Us
updownchecker.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 39

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

updownchecker.com

Website uptime monitoring service, check is site down - Host-tracker

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

172 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

537 ms

updownchecker.com screenshot

About Website

Visit updownchecker.com now to see the best up-to-date Updown Check Er content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about updownchecker.com

Be notified via email, SMS, Skype, Viber, Hangout when your website is down ➤ Monitor http availability, ping, port access, trace route, DNSBL, db query results and snmp agent from many world regions.

Visit updownchecker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Updownchecker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

updownchecker.com performance score

39

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

36/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.0 s

32/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,300 ms

5/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.2 s

9/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

updownchecker.com

172 ms

www.host-tracker.com

343 ms

en

231 ms

enterprise.js

39 ms

css

33 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Updownchecker.com, 53% (29 requests) were made to Host-tracker.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (343 ms) relates to the external source Host-tracker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 322.3 kB (25%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

941.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Updownchecker.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 627.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 197.7 kB

  • Original 221.6 kB
  • After minification 164.2 kB
  • After compression 23.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 57.3 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 197.7 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 70.3 kB

  • Original 627.0 kB
  • After minification 556.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Updown Check Er needs image optimization as it can save up to 70.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 30.5 kB

  • Original 367.4 kB
  • After minification 367.4 kB
  • After compression 336.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

  • Original 48.1 kB
  • After minification 31.8 kB
  • After compression 24.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Updownchecker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (54%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Updown Check Er. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

updownchecker.com

updownchecker.com

172 ms

www.host-tracker.com

www.host-tracker.com

343 ms

en

en

231 ms

enterprise.js

enterprise.js

39 ms

css

css

33 ms

6196.14a1eb37296c79a160dd.css

6196.14a1eb37296c79a160dd.css

28 ms

v2-layout.4aacdddbdd19e21e0280.css

v2-layout.4aacdddbdd19e21e0280.css

23 ms

v12-landing.ed58d9347fda83b99e08.css

v12-landing.ed58d9347fda83b99e08.css

21 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

25 ms

inter.css

inter.css

213 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

44 ms

runtime.91e904f488a40f2f8421.js

runtime.91e904f488a40f2f8421.js

17 ms

9837.06271495684d721820dd.js

9837.06271495684d721820dd.js

19 ms

6196.873b79b21acabe79d257.js

6196.873b79b21acabe79d257.js

17 ms

v2-layout.e0299e22bd41a048fa54.js

v2-layout.e0299e22bd41a048fa54.js

18 ms

5008.ccf87a0b59104a70dc9f.js

5008.ccf87a0b59104a70dc9f.js

31 ms

4991.0bc450b2b786a6512129.js

4991.0bc450b2b786a6512129.js

27 ms

v12-landing.fda4d99f013fceadce01.js

v12-landing.fda4d99f013fceadce01.js

33 ms

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

vcd15cbe7772f49c399c6a5babf22c1241717689176015

72 ms

ga_exp.js

ga_exp.js

21 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

130 ms

logo-white.png

logo-white.png

39 ms

problems.png

problems.png

120 ms

send-mail.png

send-mail.png

118 ms

collect2.png

collect2.png

121 ms

2oneprovider-logo.png

2oneprovider-logo.png

118 ms

OTP-Bank-Logo2.png

OTP-Bank-Logo2.png

39 ms

microsoft-logo.png

microsoft-logo.png

118 ms

panasonic-logo-3.png

panasonic-logo-3.png

118 ms

worldmate-logo-3.png

worldmate-logo-3.png

121 ms

visa.svg

visa.svg

122 ms

mastercard.svg

mastercard.svg

121 ms

paypal.svg

paypal.svg

125 ms

amex.svg

amex.svg

123 ms

swift.svg

swift.svg

124 ms

crypto.png

crypto.png

126 ms

95c2a2622a75b00c1bcf.png

95c2a2622a75b00c1bcf.png

90 ms

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDv79pz3ZQZQ.woff

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDv79pz3ZQZQ.woff

68 ms

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDvD9pz3ZQZRENA.woff

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDvD9pz3ZQZRENA.woff

100 ms

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDvH9pz3ZQZRENA.woff

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDvH9pz3ZQZRENA.woff

320 ms

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDv39pz3ZQZRENA.woff

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDv39pz3ZQZRENA.woff

294 ms

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDvr9pz3ZQZRENA.woff

ea8FacM9Wef3EJPWRrHjgE4B6CnlZxHVDvr9pz3ZQZRENA.woff

166 ms

60127e352b7a11f7f1bc.ttf

60127e352b7a11f7f1bc.ttf

68 ms

js

js

126 ms

chatra.js

chatra.js

95 ms

100 ms

109 ms

hotjar-3888238.js

hotjar-3888238.js

237 ms

chat.chatra.io

chat.chatra.io

193 ms

128 ms

27 ms

modules.8da33a8f469c3b5ffcec.js

modules.8da33a8f469c3b5ffcec.js

39 ms

a6d8a3b497c16dbc8ffb8a0960232201c4a8ac26.css

a6d8a3b497c16dbc8ffb8a0960232201c4a8ac26.css

36 ms

meteor_runtime_config.js

meteor_runtime_config.js

16 ms

8eee3a8516633dd771243fa908ac80369637ad73.js

8eee3a8516633dd771243fa908ac80369637ad73.js

85 ms

Accessibility Review

updownchecker.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

updownchecker.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

updownchecker.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Updownchecker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Updownchecker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

updownchecker.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Updown Check Er. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: