6.1 sec in total
1.6 sec
4 sec
473 ms
Visit upmonitor.ru now to see the best up-to-date Upmonitor content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about upmonitor.ru
( ) 11-12 .
Visit upmonitor.ruWe analyzed Upmonitor.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
upmonitor.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value3.7 s
58/100
25%
Value6.4 s
41/100
10%
Value550 ms
53/100
30%
Value0.538
14/100
15%
Value14.4 s
9/100
10%
1605 ms
276 ms
676 ms
277 ms
414 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Upmonitor.ru, 12% (9 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Counter.rambler.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Upmonitor.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 114.6 kB (49%)
231.6 kB
117.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Upmonitor.ru main page is 231.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 88.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 68.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 68.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Upmonitor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 39.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Upmonitor.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 39.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (46%)
69
37
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Upmonitor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
upmonitor.ru
1605 ms
colorbox.css
276 ms
jquery.min.js
676 ms
jquery.cookie.js
277 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
414 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
437 ms
datepicker-ru.js
292 ms
selector.js
414 ms
function.js
414 ms
upm4_styles.css
583 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
550 ms
smi_go.gif
412 ms
top100.cnt
369 ms
banner-88x31-rambler-blue.gif
503 ms
upmonitor.gif
156 ms
rss.gif
159 ms
zavod-uzsk.ru.gif
585 ms
ndt-control.ru.gif
438 ms
telegram.png
154 ms
hr.gif
156 ms
m422.jpg
276 ms
m421.jpg
278 ms
m420.jpg
277 ms
m419.jpg
280 ms
m418.jpg
413 ms
m417.jpeg
414 ms
m416.jpg
417 ms
m415.jpg
414 ms
m414.jpg
550 ms
m413.jpg
551 ms
m411.jpg
548 ms
m410.jpg
555 ms
m412.jpg
581 ms
m409.jpg
684 ms
m408.png
823 ms
m406.jpg
686 ms
upsq.jpg
693 ms
r.gif
725 ms
ln.gif
725 ms
dg.gif
817 ms
smi_r.gif
823 ms
karandash1.gif
831 ms
m519.jpg
870 ms
m517.jpg
871 ms
m1757.jpg
951 ms
db038e124469c27e6907facac6f57e2b.gif
1374 ms
detali-zakladnye.ru.gif
1206 ms
metalorukava.ru.gif
1807 ms
steels-group.ru.gif
1016 ms
salkompens.ru.gif
1204 ms
sdk.js
54 ms
aci.js
517 ms
sdk.js
6 ms
context.js
645 ms
40 ms
pkf-sinergia.ru.gif
1075 ms
truba1.gif
1058 ms
top100.cnt
510 ms
likebox.php
281 ms
banner-88x31-rambler-blue.gif
137 ms
hit
242 ms
overlay.png
465 ms
hit
493 ms
S5yp7r4Ff9D.css
26 ms
x6r42IOOUZz.js
35 ms
xjg1QNQguf-.js
77 ms
O9zq51FKpXz.js
33 ms
qnn7MVQZYOT.js
31 ms
qwSlV7K_jlE.js
83 ms
zYzGplAqD4J.js
30 ms
p55HfXW__mM.js
88 ms
299763585_403024548601535_5818601329630034713_n.jpg
174 ms
300820386_403024551934868_5257351216227309932_n.jpg
209 ms
UXtr_j2Fwe-.png
7 ms
upmonitor.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
upmonitor.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
upmonitor.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
N/A
N/A
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upmonitor.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Upmonitor.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
upmonitor.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Upmonitor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: