Tools & Wizards About Us
upshift.work screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

upshift.work

We Make Work Better- for People and Businesses | Staffing Redefined | Upshift

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

7 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

99 ms

upshift.work screenshot

About Website

Visit upshift.work now to see the best up-to-date Upshift content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about upshift.work

We have revolutionized the old-school staffing model. Since 2016, Upshift has been connecting flexible job seekers with businesses in need of extra staff.

Visit upshift.work

Key Findings

We analyzed Upshift.work page load time and found that the first response time was 7 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

upshift.work performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

11/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.2 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,050 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value25.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

upshift.work

7 ms

upshift.work

20 ms

varify.js

62 ms

Redirect-script.js

928 ms

css

62 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Upshift.work, 15% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.wp.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Dashboard.heatmap.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source G2.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 129.2 kB (10%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Upshift.work main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 738.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 81.0 kB

  • Original 104.3 kB
  • After minification 102.6 kB
  • After compression 23.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 81.0 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 10.7 kB

  • Original 251.3 kB
  • After minification 240.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Upshift images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 34.3 kB

  • Original 738.2 kB
  • After minification 738.2 kB
  • After compression 703.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 167.8 kB
  • After minification 167.4 kB
  • After compression 164.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Upshift.work has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (82%)

Requests Now

45

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 45 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Upshift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

upshift.work

upshift.work

7 ms

upshift.work

upshift.work

20 ms

varify.js

varify.js

62 ms

Redirect-script.js

Redirect-script.js

928 ms

css

css

62 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

31 ms

styles.css

styles.css

15 ms

css

css

66 ms

uncode-privacy-public.css

uncode-privacy-public.css

25 ms

style.css

style.css

31 ms

style.css

style.css

41 ms

ipmb-style.css

ipmb-style.css

38 ms

ipmb-style-2.css

ipmb-style-2.css

38 ms

uncode-icons.css

uncode-icons.css

41 ms

style-custom.css

style-custom.css

43 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

45 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

43 ms

rbtools.min.js

rbtools.min.js

48 ms

rs6.min.js

rs6.min.js

49 ms

events.js

events.js

48 ms

segment-scroll-depth.js

segment-scroll-depth.js

48 ms

init.js

init.js

49 ms

auto.min.js

auto.min.js

45 ms

upshift.work

upshift.work

50 ms

bilmur.min.js

bilmur.min.js

43 ms

rs6.css

rs6.css

51 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

51 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

50 ms

index.js

index.js

49 ms

index.js

index.js

51 ms

js-cookie.min.js

js-cookie.min.js

51 ms

uncode-privacy-public.min.js

uncode-privacy-public.min.js

52 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

52 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

61 ms

app.js

app.js

61 ms

e-202435.js

e-202435.js

42 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

56 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

1510 ms

preprocessor.min.js

preprocessor.min.js

1455 ms

stars

stars

1526 ms

Upshift-logo.png

Upshift-logo.png

35 ms

upshift_mono_white.png

upshift_mono_white.png

35 ms

Group-2602-2.png

Group-2602-2.png

36 ms

Frame-1328-3.png

Frame-1328-3.png

36 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJnedw.ttf

1422 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedw.ttf

1423 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1JlEA.ttf

1419 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1JlEA.ttf

1419 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1JlEA.ttf

1421 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntF.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTufntF.ttf

1418 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1JlEA.ttf

1419 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1JlEA.ttf

1421 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1JlEA.ttf

1423 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEA.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1JlEA.ttf

1422 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

1410 ms

Group-94-2.jpg

Group-94-2.jpg

1362 ms

uncode-icons.woff

uncode-icons.woff

1363 ms

app.js

app.js

1390 ms

heatmap-light.min.js

heatmap-light.min.js

1261 ms

Accessibility Review

upshift.work accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

upshift.work best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

upshift.work SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upshift.work can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Upshift.work main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

upshift.work

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Upshift. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: