916 ms in total
27 ms
607 ms
282 ms
Click here to check amazing Upto content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about upto.com
Embed a website calendar that's free, beautiful, and easy to use with UpTo's modern calendar for businesses and organizations.
Visit upto.comWe analyzed Upto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 889 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
upto.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.3 s
8/100
10%
Value9.7 s
0/100
25%
Value17.9 s
0/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.011
100/100
15%
Value27.2 s
0/100
10%
27 ms
33 ms
4 ms
6 ms
28 ms
Our browser made a total of 177 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (167 requests) were addressed to the original Upto.com, 2% (4 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 1% (2 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (193 ms) relates to the external source Platform.twitter.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (56%)
2.5 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Upto.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 261.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Upto needs image optimization as it can save up to 261.5 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 438.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 438.9 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 631.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Upto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 631.6 kB or 90% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 150 (87%)
173
23
The browser has sent 173 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Upto. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 137 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
upto.com
27 ms
upto.com
33 ms
yui.css
4 ms
email.css
6 ms
base.css
28 ms
font-awesome.min.css
15 ms
js
64 ms
vendors.js
17 ms
yui-min.js
18 ms
jsonp.js
20 ms
rollup.js
17 ms
base.js
19 ms
modules.js
25 ms
base.js
20 ms
email.js
25 ms
conversion.js
162 ms
logo.png
61 ms
fbds.js
118 ms
all.js
131 ms
widgets.js
193 ms
widget-base.css
28 ms
cssbutton-min.css
25 ms
widget-modality.css
26 ms
widget-stack.css
26 ms
panel.css
26 ms
menu-icon.png
67 ms
bg.jpg
67 ms
browser.png
69 ms
phone.png
67 ms
settings.png
69 ms
people.png
70 ms
tc.png
71 ms
pistons.png
71 ms
pure.png
76 ms
quicken.png
78 ms
lions.png
76 ms
skygrass.jpg
80 ms
bcbsm.png
78 ms
lions-ss.png
84 ms
darkmap.jpg
80 ms
phones.png
79 ms
upto-ss.png
85 ms
press.png
80 ms
oop-min.js
81 ms
event-custom-base-min.js
81 ms
dom-core-min.js
82 ms
dom-base-min.js
84 ms
selector-native-min.js
84 ms
selector-min.js
83 ms
node-core-min.js
86 ms
color-base-min.js
84 ms
dom-style-min.js
85 ms
node-base-min.js
86 ms
event-base-min.js
86 ms
event-delegate-min.js
87 ms
node-event-delegate-min.js
85 ms
pluginhost-base-min.js
78 ms
pluginhost-config-min.js
78 ms
node-pluginhost-min.js
79 ms
189 ms
fbevents.js
81 ms
dom-screen-min.js
37 ms
node-screen-min.js
34 ms
node-style-min.js
33 ms
event-custom-complex-min.js
34 ms
event-synthetic-min.js
34 ms
event-mousewheel-min.js
32 ms
event-mouseenter-min.js
33 ms
event-key-min.js
33 ms
event-focus-min.js
33 ms
event-resize-min.js
64 ms
event-hover-min.js
28 ms
event-outside-min.js
62 ms
event-touch-min.js
27 ms
event-move-min.js
61 ms
event-flick-min.js
60 ms
event-valuechange-min.js
60 ms
event-tap-min.js
63 ms
attribute-core-min.js
126 ms
attribute-observable-min.js
127 ms
attribute-extras-min.js
126 ms
attribute-base-min.js
126 ms
attribute-complex-min.js
125 ms
base-core-min.js
149 ms
base-observable-min.js
149 ms
base-base-min.js
149 ms
base-pluginhost-min.js
150 ms
classnamemanager-min.js
149 ms
widget-base-min.js
148 ms
widget-htmlparser-min.js
148 ms
widget-skin-min.js
148 ms
widget-uievents-min.js
159 ms
base-build-min.js
160 ms
widget-autohide-min.js
158 ms
escape-min.js
157 ms
button-core-min.js
157 ms
all.js
116 ms
button-plugin-min.js
152 ms
widget-stdmod-min.js
154 ms
widget-buttons-min.js
151 ms
widget-modality-min.js
151 ms
widget-position-min.js
151 ms
widget-position-align-min.js
152 ms
widget-position-constrain-min.js
151 ms
widget-stack-min.js
151 ms
panel-min.js
151 ms
handlebars-base-min.js
150 ms
handlebars-compiler-min.js
150 ms
29C1C5_1_0.woff
117 ms
29C1C5_2_0.woff
117 ms
widget_iframe.2f70fb173b9000da126c79afe2098f02.html
81 ms
81 ms
jsonp-min.js
29 ms
jsonp-url-min.js
26 ms
querystring-stringify-simple-min.js
27 ms
io-base-min.js
26 ms
datatype-xml-parse-min.js
28 ms
io-xdr-min.js
28 ms
io-form-min.js
27 ms
io-upload-iframe-min.js
28 ms
queue-promote-min.js
28 ms
io-queue-min.js
31 ms
event-simulate-min.js
31 ms
async-queue-min.js
29 ms
gesture-simulate-min.js
31 ms
node-event-simulate-min.js
31 ms
file-html5-min.js
30 ms
uploader-queue-min.js
31 ms
uploader-html5-min.js
32 ms
swfdetect-min.js
31 ms
uploader-flash-min.js
32 ms
uploader-min.js
31 ms
json-parse-min.js
32 ms
autocomplete-list.css
3 ms
calendar-base.css
4 ms
calendarnavigator.css
4 ms
calendar.css
4 ms
scrollview-base.css
4 ms
scrollview-scrollbars.css
22 ms
anim-base-min.js
10 ms
anim-color-min.js
10 ms
anim-xy-min.js
11 ms
anim-curve-min.js
11 ms
anim-easing-min.js
12 ms
anim-node-plugin-min.js
11 ms
anim-scroll-min.js
12 ms
cookie-min.js
11 ms
array-extras-min.js
11 ms
autocomplete-base-min.js
12 ms
autocomplete-sources-min.js
12 ms
intl-min.js
13 ms
autocomplete-list_en.js
13 ms
selector-css2-min.js
12 ms
selector-css3-min.js
13 ms
shim-plugin-min.js
13 ms
autocomplete-list-min.js
14 ms
autocomplete-list-keys-min.js
13 ms
autocomplete-plugin-min.js
14 ms
datatype-date-parse-min.js
14 ms
datatype-date-format_en-US.js
15 ms
datatype-date-format-min.js
15 ms
datatype-date-math-min.js
14 ms
calendar-base_en.js
15 ms
calendar-base-min.js
15 ms
plugin-min.js
16 ms
calendarnavigator-min.js
15 ms
calendar-min.js
15 ms
transition-min.js
16 ms
scrollview-base-min.js
16 ms
scrollview-scrollbars-min.js
17 ms
scrollview-min.js
16 ms
text-data-wordbreak-min.js
24 ms
text-wordbreak-min.js
25 ms
autocomplete-filters-min.js
25 ms
highlight-base-min.js
23 ms
autocomplete-highlighters-min.js
23 ms
json-stringify-min.js
23 ms
upto.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
upto.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
upto.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Upto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Upto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
upto.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Upto. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: