Tools & Wizards About Us
urogyn.co.in screenshot

Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

Page Load Speed

9.5 sec in total

First Response

491 ms

Resources Loaded

6.4 sec

Page Rendered

2.6 sec

urogyn.co.in screenshot

About Website

Visit urogyn.co.in now to see the best up-to-date Urogyn content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about urogyn.co.in

Visit urogyn.co.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Urogyn.co.in page load time and found that the first response time was 491 ms and then it took 9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

urogyn.co.in performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

7/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.3 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value11,420 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value29.9 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

urogyn.co.in

491 ms

urogyn.co.in

975 ms

plugins.css

274 ms

style.css

767 ms

custom.css

691 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Urogyn.co.in, 19% (10 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Urogyn.co.in.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 404.7 kB (23%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Urogyn.co.in main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 37.4 kB

  • Original 45.4 kB
  • After minification 28.4 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.0 kB, which is 37% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 37.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Urogyn images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 10.9 kB

  • Original 86.6 kB
  • After minification 86.6 kB
  • After compression 75.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 10.9 kB or 13% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 320.9 kB

  • Original 470.0 kB
  • After minification 469.8 kB
  • After compression 149.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Urogyn.co.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 320.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (32%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Urogyn. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

urogyn.co.in

urogyn.co.in

491 ms

urogyn.co.in

urogyn.co.in

975 ms

plugins.css

plugins.css

274 ms

style.css

style.css

767 ms

custom.css

custom.css

691 ms

js

js

99 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

713 ms

plugins.js

plugins.js

1644 ms

functions.js

functions.js

717 ms

tti.min.js

tti.min.js

120 ms

tccl.min.js

tccl.min.js

106 ms

css

css

116 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

895 ms

7o9gibulXCk

7o9gibulXCk

958 ms

cb8L6WtwJDk

cb8L6WtwJDk

1202 ms

Ay5J3kk_KvU

Ay5J3kk_KvU

1968 ms

3MQEOVcerVo

3MQEOVcerVo

1940 ms

C_QR2G5BuIM

C_QR2G5BuIM

1940 ms

oLIJ54VhwGg

oLIJ54VhwGg

1940 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

849 ms

slider-one.jpg

slider-one.jpg

1115 ms

ivf-treatment.jpg

ivf-treatment.jpg

1114 ms

azoospermia-slider.jpg

azoospermia-slider.jpg

1113 ms

male-infertility-slider.jpg

male-infertility-slider.jpg

1113 ms

Dr-Surbhi.jpg

Dr-Surbhi.jpg

732 ms

dr-ashok-gupta.jpg

dr-ashok-gupta.jpg

1113 ms

Dr-meenakshi.jpg

Dr-meenakshi.jpg

1113 ms

Dr-Abhijeet.jpg

Dr-Abhijeet.jpg

1877 ms

ivf-doctor-in-delhi.jpeg

ivf-doctor-in-delhi.jpeg

3731 ms

gal1.jpg

gal1.jpg

1875 ms

gal2.jpg

gal2.jpg

1876 ms

gal21.jpg

gal21.jpg

3645 ms

gal22.jpg

gal22.jpg

3645 ms

gal23.jpg

gal23.jpg

3646 ms

gal24.jpg

gal24.jpg

3734 ms

gal25.jpg

gal25.jpg

3732 ms

gal26.jpg

gal26.jpg

3730 ms

world-map-dark.png

world-map-dark.png

3731 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff

363 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff

364 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff

593 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff

609 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff

611 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff

760 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff

609 ms

fa-brands-400.woff

fa-brands-400.woff

3233 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

3232 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

3230 ms

inspiro-icons.ttf

inspiro-icons.ttf

3246 ms

collect

collect

446 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

427 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

1041 ms

base.js

base.js

1510 ms

fetch-polyfill.js

fetch-polyfill.js

1484 ms

Accessibility Review

urogyn.co.in accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

urogyn.co.in best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

urogyn.co.in SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Urogyn.co.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Urogyn.co.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

urogyn.co.in

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Urogyn. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: