Tools & Wizards About Us
urogynecologytexas.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

urogynecologytexas.com

Baylor Scott & White Texas Urogynecology Associates

Page Load Speed

4 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

467 ms

urogynecologytexas.com screenshot

About Website

Visit urogynecologytexas.com now to see the best up-to-date Urogynecology Texas content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about urogynecologytexas.com

Learn about how the experienced physicians here are specially trained in the areas of urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive surgery.

Visit urogynecologytexas.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Urogynecologytexas.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

urogynecologytexas.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value20.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,700 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.101

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

texas-urogynecology-associates

1229 ms

optimized-min.css

12 ms

optimized-min.css

19 ms

optimized-min.css

92 ms

optimized-min.css

42 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Urogynecologytexas.com, 8% (5 requests) were made to Bswh-p-001.sitecorecontenthub.cloud and 7% (4 requests) were made to Wadcdn.azureedge.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Bswhealth.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 601.3 kB (26%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Urogynecologytexas.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 188.8 kB

  • Original 213.9 kB
  • After minification 138.2 kB
  • After compression 25.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 75.7 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 188.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 51.7 kB

  • Original 404.8 kB
  • After minification 353.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Urogynecology Texas needs image optimization as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 237.1 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB
  • After compression 1.2 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 237.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 123.6 kB

  • Original 201.2 kB
  • After minification 105.4 kB
  • After compression 77.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Urogynecologytexas.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.6 kB or 61% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (70%)

Requests Now

53

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 53 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Urogynecology Texas. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

texas-urogynecology-associates

texas-urogynecology-associates

1229 ms

optimized-min.css

optimized-min.css

12 ms

optimized-min.css

optimized-min.css

19 ms

optimized-min.css

optimized-min.css

92 ms

optimized-min.css

optimized-min.css

42 ms

optimized-min.css

optimized-min.css

26 ms

mained32a9be.css

mained32a9be.css

69 ms

VisitorIdentification.js

VisitorIdentification.js

62 ms

bswh-power.css

bswh-power.css

110 ms

bswh-locations.css

bswh-locations.css

70 ms

bswh-multi-locations.css

bswh-multi-locations.css

29 ms

gsapmin.js

gsapmin.js

37 ms

ScrollTriggermin.js

ScrollTriggermin.js

60 ms

ScrollToPluginmin.js

ScrollToPluginmin.js

61 ms

path-colors.js

path-colors.js

61 ms

optimize.js

optimize.js

62 ms

bsw-icons.css

bsw-icons.css

68 ms

js

js

62 ms

forms2.min.js

forms2.min.js

224 ms

main.css

main.css

181 ms

chunk.js

chunk.js

59 ms

main.js

main.js

203 ms

bablic-57c745d43bc985e6680df36a.js

bablic-57c745d43bc985e6680df36a.js

72 ms

en-override.js

en-override.js

154 ms

bsw-icons.css

bsw-icons.css

67 ms

sitecore.css

sitecore.css

180 ms

optimized-min.js

optimized-min.js

104 ms

optimized-min.js

optimized-min.js

84 ms

optimized-min.js

optimized-min.js

104 ms

optimized-min.js

optimized-min.js

180 ms

optimized-min.js

optimized-min.js

104 ms

optimized-min.js

optimized-min.js

104 ms

optimized-min.js

optimized-min.js

201 ms

7871b464a79chunk.js

7871b464a79chunk.js

179 ms

main39bd49e5.js

main39bd49e5.js

182 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

4 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

453 ms

552c2a19e52743b39d9b1524df9826fb

552c2a19e52743b39d9b1524df9826fb

109 ms

b28d715181544801baa2e7d04f5b86c6

b28d715181544801baa2e7d04f5b86c6

254 ms

ee2ea4a9673d4da69a3497e001799519

ee2ea4a9673d4da69a3497e001799519

254 ms

6ce345094da24da6b1e9df37163bbbc8

6ce345094da24da6b1e9df37163bbbc8

289 ms

bswh-icon-gray.svg

bswh-icon-gray.svg

96 ms

logo-bswh-full.svg

logo-bswh-full.svg

93 ms

bswh-icon-color.svg

bswh-icon-color.svg

97 ms

default-location-photo.png

default-location-photo.png

94 ms

sharpsans-bold-woff.woff

sharpsans-bold-woff.woff

288 ms

sharpsans-bold-woff.svg

sharpsans-bold-woff.svg

289 ms

main.js

main.js

53 ms

f02c4a1deaa24570b6c8f48789c5d447

f02c4a1deaa24570b6c8f48789c5d447

393 ms

b7465e0ae9714f6bbde58eac5a7249cc

b7465e0ae9714f6bbde58eac5a7249cc

398 ms

bswh-full-gray.svg

bswh-full-gray.svg

69 ms

8e98100da97446d9976ac35870598aa8

8e98100da97446d9976ac35870598aa8

392 ms

fd81a9920d6a471683e03105af798ce4

fd81a9920d6a471683e03105af798ce4

454 ms

sharpsans-semibold-woff.woff

sharpsans-semibold-woff.woff

226 ms

sharpsans-semibold-woff.svg

sharpsans-semibold-woff.svg

42 ms

sitecore.css

sitecore.css

8 ms

a95838567131424bb345700250336432

a95838567131424bb345700250336432

268 ms

sharpsans-medium-woff.svg

sharpsans-medium-woff.svg

128 ms

sharpsans-medium-woff.woff

sharpsans-medium-woff.woff

158 ms

bsw-icons.woff

bsw-icons.woff

11 ms

42 ms

Accessibility Review

urogynecologytexas.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

urogynecologytexas.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

urogynecologytexas.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Urogynecologytexas.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Urogynecologytexas.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

urogynecologytexas.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Urogynecology Texas. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: