2.3 sec in total
213 ms
1.6 sec
504 ms
Welcome to usenetcompare.com homepage info - get ready to check Usenet Compare best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about usenetcompare.com
Compare Usenet Servers, Free Usenet Accounts, Newgroup Reviews. Usenet Provider Reviews, Search and Compare
Visit usenetcompare.comWe analyzed Usenetcompare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
usenetcompare.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
69/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value290 ms
80/100
30%
Value0.031
100/100
15%
Value11.6 s
18/100
10%
213 ms
276 ms
201 ms
196 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Usenetcompare.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (779 ms) belongs to the original domain Usenetcompare.com.
Page size can be reduced by 269.5 kB (57%)
474.2 kB
204.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Usenetcompare.com main page is 474.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 184.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.9 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 385 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Usenet Compare images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 120.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 120.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 116.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usenetcompare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 116.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
We found no issues to fix!
51
51
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Usenet Compare. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
usenetcompare.com
213 ms
www.usenetcompare.com
276 ms
bootstrap.min.css
201 ms
usenetcompare-v1.css
196 ms
font-awesome.min.css
208 ms
jquery.js
301 ms
bootstrap.min.js
208 ms
newshosting.jpg
208 ms
usenetserver.jpg
282 ms
easynews.jpg
287 ms
astraweb.jpg
289 ms
frugal.jpg
298 ms
giganews.jpg
323 ms
newsdemon.jpg
378 ms
fastusenet.jpg
478 ms
eweka.jpg
387 ms
altbinaries.gif
394 ms
astraweb.gif
399 ms
bintube.gif
398 ms
blocknews.gif
476 ms
cheapnews.gif
486 ms
easynews.gif
492 ms
eweka.gif
497 ms
fastusenet.gif
497 ms
frugal.gif
573 ms
giganews.gif
575 ms
maximumusenet.gif
585 ms
newsdemon.gif
588 ms
newsgroupdirect.gif
593 ms
newsgroups.gif
596 ms
newsguy.gif
670 ms
newshosting.gif
671 ms
newsservers.gif
681 ms
ngroups.gif
684 ms
powerusenet.gif
690 ms
pureusenet.gif
694 ms
redorb.gif
766 ms
rhinonews.gif
768 ms
simplyusenet.gif
601 ms
supernews.gif
590 ms
terranews.gif
585 ms
thundernews.gif
591 ms
tweaknews.gif
661 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
779 ms
unliminews.gif
597 ms
usenetmonster.gif
595 ms
usenetnet.gif
590 ms
analytics.js
5 ms
usenetnl.gif
576 ms
usenetnow.gif
645 ms
collect
12 ms
usenetserver.gif
602 ms
XLned.gif
592 ms
tick.png
589 ms
usenetcompare.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
usenetcompare.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
usenetcompare.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usenetcompare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Usenetcompare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usenetcompare.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Usenet Compare. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: