2.8 sec in total
33 ms
2.2 sec
653 ms
Visit userlook.co now to see the best up-to-date User Look content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about userlook.co
Watch screen recordings of real users testing and reviewing your app or website—and improve your usability, user experience and customer retention.
Visit userlook.coWe analyzed Userlook.co page load time and found that the first response time was 33 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
userlook.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value6.5 s
38/100
10%
Value730 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.202
61/100
15%
Value8.1 s
42/100
10%
33 ms
68 ms
86 ms
842 ms
105 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Userlook.co, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (842 ms) relates to the external source Playback-assets.s3.ap-northeast-2.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 71.9 kB (13%)
545.5 kB
473.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Userlook.co main page is 545.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 484.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. User Look images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (33%)
43
29
The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of User Look. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
userlook.co
33 ms
css
68 ms
icon
86 ms
index.js
842 ms
js
105 ms
checkout.js
71 ms
plyr.css
71 ms
plyr.js
88 ms
EBML.js
88 ms
styles.694c3c9e6ab9225cde2a.css
28 ms
runtime.bc2312c4076af27e51c9.js
158 ms
polyfills-es5.09281d7a3e9e66c7da46.js
129 ms
polyfills.17d10b152976b818b674.js
63 ms
scripts.bdab7c916832d08d54b9.js
58 ms
main.3ff88e4a73a2dc877c89.js
84 ms
qevents.js
469 ms
fbr_logo_responsive.png
440 ms
js
247 ms
analytics.js
239 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTD-JqaE0lM.woff
330 ms
qkBIXvYC6trAT55ZBi1ueQVIjQTDH52aE0lM.woff
330 ms
en.json
115 ms
20.6b9950202ad97fb23e2a.js
115 ms
pixel
104 ms
pixel
104 ms
collect
138 ms
cover-bg-1.png
137 ms
cover-bg-2.png
103 ms
cover-bg-3.png
115 ms
homepage_demo_still.png
89 ms
play-btn.png
88 ms
cakelogo.png
178 ms
urbanftlogo.png
184 ms
snaptravellogo.png
204 ms
leaninlogo.png
217 ms
datainsight-illustration.png
293 ms
starttesting-illustration.png
238 ms
people-illustration.png
195 ms
quote-icon.png
333 ms
joe-cake-browser.png
345 ms
alexx-coach-rabbit.png
394 ms
patrina-kbro.png
384 ms
logo-new.png
319 ms
medium.png
441 ms
twitter.png
524 ms
cta-bg.png
437 ms
channel
63 ms
userlook.co accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
userlook.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
userlook.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Userlook.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Userlook.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
userlook.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of User Look. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: