9.5 sec in total
3.7 sec
5.5 sec
308 ms
Visit usfilter.net now to see the best up-to-date Usfilter content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about usfilter.net
USFilters work for more than a quarter of a century in the middle east, to provide the best and latest products in the field of purification and desalination of water and ultrafiltration systems snd s...
Visit usfilter.netWe analyzed Usfilter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 3.7 sec and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
usfilter.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.0 s
0/100
10%
Value18.1 s
0/100
25%
Value18.7 s
0/100
10%
Value300 ms
78/100
30%
Value0.018
100/100
15%
Value17.1 s
4/100
10%
3716 ms
697 ms
938 ms
471 ms
475 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (47 requests) were addressed to the original Usfilter.net, 8% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Usfilter.net.
Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (57%)
2.9 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Usfilter.net main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 122.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Usfilter needs image optimization as it can save up to 129.9 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 781.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 781.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 644.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usfilter.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 644.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (61%)
44
17
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Usfilter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
usfilter.net
3716 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
697 ms
style.min.css
938 ms
styles.css
471 ms
style.min.css
475 ms
be.css
1913 ms
animations.min.css
1174 ms
fontawesome.css
1186 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.min.css
926 ms
responsive.css
1617 ms
css
38 ms
jquery.min.js
951 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
953 ms
rbtools.min.js
1441 ms
rs6.min.js
2826 ms
home_energy_header_bgd.jpg
1072 ms
US-Logos-web-1.png
1680 ms
dummy.png
237 ms
NO-scaled.jpg
488 ms
7Auup_AqnyWWAxW2Wk3swUz56MS91Eww8SX21nejpw.ttf
20 ms
fancy_heading_hr.png
237 ms
coolpng31.png
462 ms
home_energy_arrow_right.png
989 ms
ascascasc.png
703 ms
asas.jpg
470 ms
US-Logos-web-1.png
675 ms
home_energy_molecules_bgd-1.png
1695 ms
stripes_3_b.png
907 ms
aqqwqwdqqwqqw-220x100-150x68-150x68.png
923 ms
a4-220x100-150x68-150x68.png
970 ms
a3-220x100-150x68-1-150x68.png
1138 ms
a2-220x100-150x68-150x68.png
1160 ms
ascasas-220x100-150x68-150x68.png
1193 ms
IWA-1-97x75-97x75.jpg
1199 ms
css
34 ms
post-48.css
1196 ms
rs6.css
1363 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
1392 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
1420 ms
index.js
1431 ms
core.min.js
1432 ms
tabs.min.js
1592 ms
plugins.js
1866 ms
menu.js
1655 ms
animations.min.js
1669 ms
icons.woff
1622 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
5 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
19 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
33 ms
jplayer.min.js
1627 ms
translate3d.js
1692 ms
scripts.js
1710 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1712 ms
usfilter.net accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
usfilter.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
usfilter.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usfilter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Usfilter.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usfilter.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Usfilter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: