1.2 sec in total
91 ms
937 ms
127 ms
Visit usinspect.com now to see the best up-to-date US Inspect content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about usinspect.com
We deliver the best home inspections in your neighborhood. Our reputation is built on 30 years of honesty, integrity and excellent service to customers during one of their most important life decision...
Visit usinspect.comWe analyzed Usinspect.com page load time and found that the first response time was 91 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
usinspect.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
37/100
10%
Value8.0 s
2/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value820 ms
35/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value15.7 s
6/100
10%
91 ms
86 ms
68 ms
36 ms
103 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Usinspect.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (346 ms) belongs to the original domain Usinspect.com.
Page size can be reduced by 95.8 kB (56%)
171.3 kB
75.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Usinspect.com main page is 171.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 112.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 86.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 86.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. US Inspect images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 9.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 9.3 kB or 28% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (84%)
77
12
The browser has sent 77 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of US Inspect. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
usinspect.com
91 ms
www.usinspect.com
86 ms
js
68 ms
remodal.css
36 ms
remodal-default-theme.css
103 ms
marker-library-dialog.css
61 ms
pmb-common.css
60 ms
style.min.css
102 ms
select2.min.css
50 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
106 ms
setup-page.css
108 ms
mashsb.min.css
107 ms
widget-options.css
108 ms
public-main.css
143 ms
components.css
168 ms
style.css
148 ms
style.css
144 ms
css
48 ms
wc-private-store.min.css
164 ms
js_composer.min.css
181 ms
jquery.min.js
173 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
170 ms
remodal.min.js
173 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
173 ms
mashsb.min.js
177 ms
rbtools.min.js
221 ms
rs6.min.js
244 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
242 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
241 ms
js.cookie.min.js
241 ms
woocommerce.min.js
251 ms
wpgmza_data.js
253 ms
wp-hide-post-public.js
252 ms
woocommerce-add-to-cart.js
254 ms
public-main.js
287 ms
rbtools.min.js
287 ms
rs6.min.js
310 ms
widget.js
92 ms
formreset.min.css
302 ms
formsmain.min.css
300 ms
css
42 ms
readyclass.min.css
300 ms
browsers.min.css
331 ms
rs6.css
266 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
339 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
337 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
293 ms
dom-ready.min.js
293 ms
hooks.min.js
290 ms
i18n.min.js
289 ms
a11y.min.js
346 ms
jquery.json.min.js
312 ms
gravityforms.min.js
304 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
231 ms
gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js
286 ms
scripts.js
278 ms
sms-link.min.js
314 ms
components.js
315 ms
theme.js
310 ms
frontend.min.js
309 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
308 ms
utils.min.js
305 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
304 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
289 ms
gtm.js
62 ms
icon_arrow_white.png
250 ms
us-inspect-logo.png
251 ms
search.svg
251 ms
dummy.png
249 ms
Click-Here-200-x-60-px-180x50.png
254 ms
Google-Reviews-Image-300x150.png
255 ms
font
87 ms
destination
101 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
169 ms
analytics.js
83 ms
collect
22 ms
collect
42 ms
js
75 ms
ga-audiences
117 ms
loader.js
105 ms
usinspect.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
usinspect.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
usinspect.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usinspect.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Usinspect.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usinspect.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of US Inspect. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: