Tools & Wizards About Us
utypiapage.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 74% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 67

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    26% of websites

utypiapage.com

Software for Rubber Stamps, Web2Print and Engravings - uTypia Internet Shops

Page Load Speed

2.8 sec in total

First Response

294 ms

Resources Loaded

2.4 sec

Page Rendered

71 ms

utypiapage.com screenshot

About Website

Visit utypiapage.com now to see the best up-to-date UTypia Page content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about utypiapage.com

Internet shops for rubber stamps, signs, print products and other customised products. By means of layout preview, logo upload, text optimisation, and a lot of other functions, products can be persona...

Visit utypiapage.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Utypiapage.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

utypiapage.com performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

74/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

80/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

81/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value20 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.011

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.6 s

69/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

utypiapage.com

294 ms

Default.aspx

382 ms

controls.css

443 ms

page-layouts-21.css

234 ms

portal.css

445 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Utypiapage.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (575 ms) belongs to the original domain Utypiapage.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 45.6 kB (17%)

Content Size

270.7 kB

After Optimization

225.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Utypiapage.com main page is 270.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 178.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 35.4 kB

  • Original 45.7 kB
  • After minification 43.2 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 35.4 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 114 B

  • Original 5.1 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. UTypia Page images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 178.2 kB
  • After minification 178.1 kB
  • After compression 176.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 8.3 kB

  • Original 41.6 kB
  • After minification 41.6 kB
  • After compression 33.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Utypiapage.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.3 kB or 20% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (75%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of UTypia Page. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

utypiapage.com

utypiapage.com

294 ms

Default.aspx

Default.aspx

382 ms

controls.css

controls.css

443 ms

page-layouts-21.css

page-layouts-21.css

234 ms

portal.css

portal.css

445 ms

core.css

core.css

575 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

228 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

454 ms

blank.js

blank.js

233 ms

init.js

init.js

227 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

437 ms

ScriptResource.axd

ScriptResource.axd

120 ms

helpicon.gif

helpicon.gif

120 ms

titlegraphic.gif

titlegraphic.gif

115 ms

gosearch15.png

gosearch15.png

116 ms

menudark.gif

menudark.gif

116 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

119 ms

WebResource.axd

WebResource.axd

119 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

226 ms

lstbulet.gif

lstbulet.gif

227 ms

siteTitleBKGD.gif

siteTitleBKGD.gif

207 ms

topnavselected.gif

topnavselected.gif

214 ms

topnavunselected.gif

topnavunselected.gif

215 ms

pageTitleBKGD.gif

pageTitleBKGD.gif

215 ms

topshape.jpg

topshape.jpg

318 ms

navshape.jpg

navshape.jpg

316 ms

quickLaunchHeader.gif

quickLaunchHeader.gif

317 ms

navBullet.gif

navBullet.gif

328 ms

pagebackgrad.gif

pagebackgrad.gif

329 ms

core.js

core.js

554 ms

search.js

search.js

116 ms

sp.core.js

sp.core.js

110 ms

ScriptResx.ashx

ScriptResx.ashx

113 ms

cui.js

cui.js

328 ms

Accessibility Review

utypiapage.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Best Practices

utypiapage.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

SEO Factors

utypiapage.com SEO score

67

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Utypiapage.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Utypiapage.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

utypiapage.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of UTypia Page. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: