Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

forum.videoediting.ru

videoediting.ru

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

385 ms

forum.videoediting.ru screenshot

About Website

Welcome to forum.videoediting.ru homepage info - get ready to check Fo Ru M Videoediting best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about forum.videoediting.ru

Visit forum.videoediting.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Forum.videoediting.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

forum.videoediting.ru performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

78/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

95/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

84/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value280 ms

80/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.4 s

60/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

forum.videoediting.ru

1201 ms

index.php

323 ms

index.php

647 ms

index.php

492 ms

jsapi

44 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Forum.videoediting.ru, 49% (25 requests) were made to I.videoediting.ru and 8% (4 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source I.videoediting.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 216.2 kB (60%)

Content Size

357.9 kB

After Optimization

141.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Forum.videoediting.ru main page is 357.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 130.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 108.7 kB

  • Original 124.8 kB
  • After minification 92.9 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 31.8 kB, which is 26% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.7 kB or 87% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-25%

Potential reduce by 25.4 kB

  • Original 102.2 kB
  • After minification 76.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fo Ru M Videoediting needs image optimization as it can save up to 25.4 kB or 25% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 82.0 kB

  • Original 130.9 kB
  • After minification 129.5 kB
  • After compression 48.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 82.0 kB or 63% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (43%)

Requests Now

49

After Optimization

28

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fo Ru M Videoediting. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

forum.videoediting.ru accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

forum.videoediting.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

forum.videoediting.ru SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Forum.videoediting.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Forum.videoediting.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fo Ru M Videoediting. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: