Tools & Wizards About Us
giline.versus.jp screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 33

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 18% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

giline.versus.jp

トップページ

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

559 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

111 ms

giline.versus.jp screenshot

About Website

Welcome to giline.versus.jp homepage info - get ready to check Giline Versus best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about giline.versus.jp

ナウでヤングな方の為のレンタルサーバーです。可愛いアドレスがたくさん！おこづかいでＯＫの格安プランは月額250円からだよ！

Visit giline.versus.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Giline.versus.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

giline.versus.jp performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.038

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

giline.versus.jp

559 ms

dmy.html

510 ms

index.html

515 ms

dmy.html

517 ms

index.html

519 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Giline.versus.jp, 45% (5 requests) were made to User.lolipop.jp and 18% (2 requests) were made to Users.lolipop.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Assets.lolipop.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 571 B (50%)

Content Size

1.1 kB

After Optimization

564 B

  • HTML

In fact, the total size of Giline.versus.jp main page is 1.1 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 1.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 571 B

  • Original 1.1 kB
  • After minification 894 B
  • After compression 564 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 241 B, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 571 B or 50% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

  • AJAX
  • Images

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Giline Versus. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

giline.versus.jp

giline.versus.jp

559 ms

dmy.html

dmy.html

510 ms

index.html

index.html

515 ms

dmy.html

dmy.html

517 ms

index.html

index.html

519 ms

lolipop1.gif

lolipop1.gif

552 ms

bnr_welcome_page.gif

bnr_welcome_page.gif

1083 ms

sp.gif

sp.gif

172 ms

girl.gif

girl.gif

170 ms

welcome.gif

welcome.gif

343 ms

lolipop1.gif

lolipop1.gif

544 ms

Accessibility Review

giline.versus.jp accessibility score

33

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

giline.versus.jp best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

giline.versus.jp SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    SHIFT_JIS

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Giline.versus.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Giline.versus.jp main page’s claimed encoding is shift_jis. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

giline.versus.jp

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Giline Versus. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: