4.8 sec in total
286 ms
4.2 sec
314 ms
Welcome to kredit.vergleich.de homepage info - get ready to check Kredit Vergleich best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about kredit.vergleich.de
Sie möchten einen Kredit aufnehmen? Unser Kreditvergleich zeigt günstige Kredite für Ihre Wünsche. √ Online-Kredite vergleichen √ aktuelle Kreditzinsen
Visit kredit.vergleich.deWe analyzed Kredit.vergleich.de page load time and found that the first response time was 286 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
kredit.vergleich.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value22.9 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value1,700 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value22.5 s
1/100
10%
286 ms
514 ms
564 ms
110 ms
208 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Kredit.vergleich.de, 42% (42 requests) were made to Vergleich.de and 15% (15 requests) were made to Finanzcheck-cdn.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (716 ms) relates to the external source Finanzcheck-cdn.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 698.1 kB (64%)
1.1 MB
387.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Kredit.vergleich.de main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 619.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.7 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Kredit Vergleich needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.1 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 359.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 359.8 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 290.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kredit.vergleich.de needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 290.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (54%)
93
43
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kredit Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
kredit.vergleich.de
286 ms
514 ms
ratenkredit-vergleich.html
564 ms
head-a9572c83f09bec8b974271a4a38c46c1.merged.css
110 ms
stylesheet_c111c53cdf.css
208 ms
seoLayer.css
295 ms
stylesheet_9af42d630b.css
291 ms
jquery-1.7.x-1.8.x-1.2.x.js
490 ms
feedback.js
296 ms
seoLayer.js
294 ms
head-41d1883b1706ff37963ac7b8b43d6788.merged.js
302 ms
tooltipp.js
390 ms
css
64 ms
css
78 ms
iframe.js
445 ms
conversion.js
44 ms
js.cookie.js
385 ms
cookie_usage_layer.js
386 ms
27698.min.js
356 ms
gtm.js
100 ms
header_icon.gif
121 ms
vergleich.gif
119 ms
header_corners.gif
119 ms
header_corner_left.gif
118 ms
bt_send.gif
119 ms
listenpfeil_weiss_auf_blau_down.gif
119 ms
listenpfeil_sub_weiss_auf_blau.gif
204 ms
listenpfeil_weiss_auf_blau.gif
204 ms
hl_pfeil_blau.gif
191 ms
teaser-bg-820px.jpg
323 ms
advcheck.png
192 ms
geprueft-de.png
193 ms
ausgezeichnet-org.jpg
311 ms
ekomi.jpg
296 ms
clear.gif
299 ms
84 ms
logo_gplus.gif
293 ms
logo_facebook.gif
294 ms
logo_twitter.gif
377 ms
logo_rss.gif
393 ms
logo_vglblog.gif
392 ms
socialshareprivacy.css
371 ms
embed.css
95 ms
589 ms
adex.js
499 ms
bg-layer.png
354 ms
ajax-loading.gif
354 ms
dummy_facebook.png
421 ms
dummy_twitter.png
434 ms
dummy_gplus.png
435 ms
pfeil-transparent.png
437 ms
pfeil-transparent-inaktiv.png
441 ms
fbevents.js
176 ms
analytics.js
32 ms
49 ms
linkid.js
10 ms
ec.js
11 ms
collect
3 ms
collect
103 ms
jquery.min.js
68 ms
submitting_data.gif
93 ms
default
250 ms
93 ms
socialshareprivacy_on_off.png
99 ms
46.css.gz
624 ms
jquery.min.js
14 ms
common.js
185 ms
routing
180 ms
offers.js
363 ms
t.js
87 ms
analytic.js
86 ms
168 ms
pixel
36 ms
generic
31 ms
generic
3 ms
2.gif
87 ms
cm.gif
168 ms
css
19 ms
loader.gif
121 ms
56.svg
456 ms
14.svg
459 ms
34.svg
457 ms
15.svg
455 ms
29.svg
454 ms
37.svg
618 ms
54.svg
536 ms
23.svg
539 ms
25.svg
541 ms
33.svg
551 ms
41.svg
552 ms
19.svg
716 ms
22.svg
630 ms
77.svg
635 ms
46.svg
640 ms
1.gif
153 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
153 ms
ua
273 ms
log
288 ms
nr-852.min.js
93 ms
mastertag.kpcustomer.de
424 ms
c62224dcc2
129 ms
kredit.vergleich.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
kredit.vergleich.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
kredit.vergleich.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kredit.vergleich.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Kredit.vergleich.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
kredit.vergleich.de
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kredit Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: