Tools & Wizards About Us
valetravel.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 41

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

valetravel.net

Coach operators | Aylesbury | Vale Travel

Page Load Speed

764 ms in total

First Response

93 ms

Resources Loaded

609 ms

Page Rendered

62 ms

valetravel.net screenshot

About Website

Visit valetravel.net now to see the best up-to-date Vale Travel content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about valetravel.net

Vale Travel have been Aylesbury’s local coach operators for 30 years. Rely on us for quality service and affordable travel.

Visit valetravel.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Valetravel.net page load time and found that the first response time was 93 ms and then it took 671 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

valetravel.net performance score

41

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value710 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.092

92/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.valetravel.net

93 ms

minified.js

38 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

36 ms

polyfill.min.js

31 ms

thunderbolt-commons.01583709.bundle.min.js

134 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Valetravel.net, 40% (16 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 30% (12 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (261 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 532.5 kB (56%)

Content Size

947.6 kB

After Optimization

415.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Valetravel.net main page is 947.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 654.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 528.9 kB

  • Original 654.6 kB
  • After minification 652.9 kB
  • After compression 125.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 528.9 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 41.7 kB
  • After minification 41.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vale Travel images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 251.3 kB
  • After minification 251.3 kB
  • After compression 247.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (34%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

21

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vale Travel. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.valetravel.net

www.valetravel.net

93 ms

minified.js

minified.js

38 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

36 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

31 ms

thunderbolt-commons.01583709.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.01583709.bundle.min.js

134 ms

main.68eafee5.bundle.min.js

main.68eafee5.bundle.min.js

138 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

28 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

138 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

135 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

138 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

137 ms

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

wix-perf-measure.umd.min.js

138 ms

3e9f09_901b2bfa44fd4636aebe5b47f5562171f000.jpg

3e9f09_901b2bfa44fd4636aebe5b47f5562171f000.jpg

261 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

69 ms

Front%20view%20of%20coach.jpg

Front%20view%20of%20coach.jpg

226 ms

side%20view%20of%20coach.jpg

side%20view%20of%20coach.jpg

259 ms

3e9f09_a7cb116d19e74a7ea1267c7454b9ab02~mv2.jpg

3e9f09_a7cb116d19e74a7ea1267c7454b9ab02~mv2.jpg

232 ms

150 ms

143 ms

143 ms

141 ms

140 ms

141 ms

172 ms

170 ms

168 ms

165 ms

164 ms

164 ms

file.woff

file.woff

7 ms

file.woff

file.woff

17 ms

file.woff

file.woff

17 ms

file.woff

file.woff

18 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

4 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

22 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

4 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

16 ms

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforDisplay_W_Bd.woff

3 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Bd.woff

4 ms

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

WixMadeforText_W_Rg.woff

8 ms

Accessibility Review

valetravel.net accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

valetravel.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

valetravel.net SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Valetravel.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Valetravel.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

valetravel.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vale Travel. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: