4.5 sec in total
917 ms
2.7 sec
914 ms
Click here to check amazing Valour content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about valour.co.uk
Visit valour.co.ukWe analyzed Valour.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 917 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
valour.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.5 s
0/100
10%
Value8.6 s
1/100
25%
Value12.1 s
4/100
10%
Value1,190 ms
21/100
30%
Value0.006
100/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
917 ms
212 ms
270 ms
270 ms
282 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Valour.co.uk, 17% (15 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (917 ms) belongs to the original domain Valour.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 245.3 kB (22%)
1.1 MB
885.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Valour.co.uk main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 415.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 221.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 221.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Valour needs image optimization as it can save up to 20.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Valour.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (87%)
69
9
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Valour. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 34 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
valour.co.uk
917 ms
styles.css
212 ms
uacf7-frontend.css
270 ms
form-style.css
270 ms
countrySelect.min.css
282 ms
style.css
286 ms
style.min.css
288 ms
theme.min.css
309 ms
header-footer.min.css
358 ms
frontend.min.css
360 ms
post-9.css
377 ms
swiper.min.css
383 ms
e-swiper.min.css
383 ms
frontend.min.css
417 ms
global.css
453 ms
animations.min.css
451 ms
post-6.css
472 ms
post-10.css
478 ms
post-56.css
481 ms
ekiticons.css
515 ms
widget-styles.css
556 ms
responsive.css
542 ms
css
32 ms
jquery.min.js
592 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
606 ms
widget-image.min.css
497 ms
widget-heading.min.css
615 ms
widget-icon-box.min.css
615 ms
widget-text-editor.min.css
617 ms
widget-icon-list.min.css
617 ms
all.min.css
617 ms
twae-common-styles.min.css
618 ms
twae-vertical-timeline.min.css
618 ms
widget-divider.min.css
698 ms
wpforms-full.min.css
699 ms
hooks.min.js
721 ms
i18n.min.js
722 ms
api.js
33 ms
index.js
720 ms
index.js
628 ms
countrySelect.js
589 ms
script.js
588 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
633 ms
frontend-script.js
632 ms
widget-scripts.js
652 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
631 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
591 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
593 ms
frontend.min.js
636 ms
core.min.js
653 ms
frontend.min.js
630 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
602 ms
animate-circle.min.js
555 ms
elementor.js
583 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
622 ms
mailcheck.min.js
628 ms
punycode.min.js
629 ms
utils.min.js
591 ms
wpforms.min.js
573 ms
wpforms-modern.min.js
529 ms
logo-1-1.png
532 ms
appp-white.png
728 ms
630c9d66b066bfa900c561ba_Hand-With-Watch-p-1080.webp
482 ms
submit-spin.svg
488 ms
logo-1-2.png
490 ms
Switzer-Regular.woff
118 ms
Switzer-Thin-1.ttf
180 ms
Switzer-Bold.woff
201 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
29 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
49 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
78 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
111 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
113 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
113 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
114 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
113 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
111 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
113 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
114 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
114 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
114 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
115 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
114 ms
elementskit.woff
728 ms
recaptcha__en.js
31 ms
fallback
22 ms
fallback__ltr.css
3 ms
css
19 ms
logo_48.png
3 ms
valour.co.uk accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
valour.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
valour.co.uk SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Valour.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Valour.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
valour.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Valour. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: