2.6 sec in total
431 ms
1.3 sec
851 ms
Visit valueguardinspections.com now to see the best up-to-date Value Guard Inspections content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about valueguardinspections.com
ValueGuard Home Inspectors have the experience and knowledge you deserve. See Things Differently. Eliminate Surprises. Support You Deserve.
Visit valueguardinspections.comWe analyzed Valueguardinspections.com page load time and found that the first response time was 431 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
valueguardinspections.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value27.6 s
0/100
25%
Value14.7 s
1/100
10%
Value5,830 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value27.4 s
0/100
10%
431 ms
354 ms
45 ms
27 ms
43 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Valueguardinspections.com, 79% (38 requests) were made to Djn602lg70x7o.cloudfront.net and 4% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (564 ms) relates to the external source Djn602lg70x7o.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 106.4 kB (8%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Valueguardinspections.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 43.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.0 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Value Guard Inspections images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 7.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 125 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Valueguardinspections.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (15%)
34
29
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Value Guard Inspections. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
valueguardinspections.com
431 ms
js
354 ms
oribi.js
45 ms
style.css
27 ms
vendor.js
43 ms
embed.js
38 ms
app.js
136 ms
phone-homerapport.svg
265 ms
XSWklzLt
435 ms
Iv0UWtWr
426 ms
ill-representative.svg
282 ms
ill-question.svg
284 ms
ill-clipboardcheck.svg
299 ms
ill-handpaper.svg
296 ms
ill-checklist.svg
300 ms
ill-trophy.svg
295 ms
ill-sendpaper.svg
298 ms
yspot-face-jim_opt-200x200.png
294 ms
bg-footer.png
304 ms
logo-alt-full.svg
304 ms
badge-angies.png
304 ms
badge-google.png
304 ms
badge-yelp.png
304 ms
badge-bbb.png
305 ms
badge-ashi.png
307 ms
badge-padeptenv.png
307 ms
Holiday-Sale-Promo-2-480x480.png
308 ms
vg-ui-text-regular-webfont.woff
403 ms
vg-ui-text-medium-webfont.woff
327 ms
vg-ui-text-light-webfont.woff
329 ms
vg-ui-text-thin-webfont.woff
381 ms
vg-ui-text-semibold-webfont.woff
564 ms
vg-ui-text-bold-webfont.woff
400 ms
ajax-loader.gif
112 ms
_pcicons.svg
103 ms
_pcicons.ttf
103 ms
vg-ui-text-lightitalic-webfont.woff
153 ms
vg-ui-text-regularitalic-webfont.woff
103 ms
vg-ui-text-mediumitalic-webfont.woff
173 ms
vg-ui-text-semibolditalic-webfont.woff
174 ms
vg-ui-text-bolditalic-webfont.woff
172 ms
home-aspot--house_opt.png
184 ms
home-aspot--clouds_opt.jpg
173 ms
home-aspot--sky_opt.jpg
182 ms
promisebg-jim_opt-480x611.png
280 ms
js
110 ms
analytics.js
33 ms
collect
57 ms
valueguardinspections.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
valueguardinspections.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
valueguardinspections.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Valueguardinspections.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Valueguardinspections.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
valueguardinspections.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Value Guard Inspections. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: