1.8 sec in total
123 ms
1.4 sec
252 ms
Click here to check amazing Vanitypoint content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about vanitypoint.com
Vanity Point is a leading mobile app development company in Salt Lake City, Utah. We offer custom mobile & web application development services for all industries
Visit vanitypoint.comWe analyzed Vanitypoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 123 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
vanitypoint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
73/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value9.6 s
11/100
10%
Value210 ms
89/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value9.2 s
32/100
10%
123 ms
324 ms
83 ms
130 ms
110 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vanitypoint.com, 74% (57 requests) were made to Vanitymobileapps.com and 16% (12 requests) were made to Themes.googleusercontent.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (419 ms) relates to the external source Vanitymobileapps.com.
Page size can be reduced by 414.9 kB (25%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Vanitypoint.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 46.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 17.8 kB, which is 32% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 46.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vanitypoint images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 243.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 243.3 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 121.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vanitypoint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 121.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (64%)
61
22
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vanitypoint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
vanitypoint.com
123 ms
www.vanitymobileapps.com
324 ms
core.min.css
83 ms
font-awesome.min.css
130 ms
sequence-looptheme.css
110 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
114 ms
superfish.css
117 ms
component.css
121 ms
pp.css
125 ms
style.css
159 ms
modernizr.custom.js
187 ms
jquery.popup.css
165 ms
popup-contact.css
185 ms
jquery-1.9.1.js
11 ms
jquery.popup.js
174 ms
jquery.js
239 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
191 ms
jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js
209 ms
jquery.sequence-min.js
226 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
227 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
225 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.min.js
250 ms
jquery.ui.accordion.min.js
246 ms
jquery.bxslider.min.js
278 ms
jquery.BlackAndWhite.min.js
275 ms
superfish.js
278 ms
jquery.dlmenu.js
419 ms
jquery.knob.js
287 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
288 ms
jquery-animate-css-rotate-scale.js
327 ms
jquery.quicksand.js
328 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
323 ms
custom.js
339 ms
twitterFetcher_v10_min.js
328 ms
jquery.jfeed.pack.js
368 ms
gen_validatorv31.js
375 ms
fg_ajax.js
357 ms
fg_captcha_validator.js
373 ms
fg_moveable_popup.js
366 ms
fg_form_submitter.js
354 ms
ssp.css
292 ms
ga.js
92 ms
popup_close.png
104 ms
vanitypoint.png
78 ms
search.png
78 ms
mobile-web-design.png
209 ms
why-vanity-point.png
251 ms
mouthy.jpg
207 ms
myemr.jpg
210 ms
exclusive.jpg
233 ms
proshow.jpg
227 ms
kollektiv.jpg
232 ms
offendersarchive.jpg
275 ms
orderngo.jpg
319 ms
promusician.jpg
389 ms
show-captcha.php
353 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGNbE_oMaV8t2eFeISPpzbdE.woff
22 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGMa9awK0IKUjIWABZIchFI8.woff
24 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlBM0YzuT7MdOe03otPbuUS0.woff
23 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGJ6-ys_j0H4QL65VLqzI3wI.woff
22 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGFkQc6VGVFSmCnC_l7QZG60.woff
23 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGHiec-hVyr2k4iOzEQsW1iE.woff
23 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
217 ms
M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoMzNrcjQuD0pTu1za2FULaMs.woff
23 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6GGomRtBD2u8FwSY4jjlmeA.woff
23 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6PwwJPUC4r0o28cUCbhjOjM.woff
23 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6PULlOK_XQENnt2ryrY843E.woff
24 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6Nog-We9VNve39Jr4Vs_aDc.woff
24 ms
fpTVHK8qsXbIeTHTrnQH6ONg1gFYvjbPSGxSBhvPu6E.woff
23 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
405725180623728643
163 ms
bx_loader.gif
146 ms
abc.png
141 ms
211593728a09bdca332cd49108962719_400x400.jpeg
45 ms
proxy.jpg
47 ms
proxy.jpg
47 ms
www.vanitymobileapps.com
124 ms
vanitypoint.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
vanitypoint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
vanitypoint.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vanitypoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vanitypoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
vanitypoint.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Vanitypoint. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: