Tools & Wizards About Us
vantieghem.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 54

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

vantieghem.com

David Van Tieghem

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

127 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

57 ms

vantieghem.com screenshot

About Website

Visit vantieghem.com now to see the best up-to-date Van Tieghem content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about vantieghem.com

Composer, Percussionist, Sound Designer, Performer

Visit vantieghem.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Vantieghem.com page load time and found that the first response time was 127 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vantieghem.com performance score

54

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,660 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.025

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.6 s

14/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.vantieghem.com

127 ms

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

26 ms

thunderbolt-commons.dae61f88.bundle.min.js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Vantieghem.com, 42% (13 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com and 42% (13 requests) were made to Sentry-next.wixpress.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (745 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 274.1 kB (44%)

Content Size

630.2 kB

After Optimization

356.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Vantieghem.com main page is 630.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 306.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 226.0 kB

  • Original 304.3 kB
  • After minification 302.7 kB
  • After compression 78.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 226.0 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 19.1 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Van Tieghem images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 48.1 kB

  • Original 306.9 kB
  • After minification 306.9 kB
  • After compression 258.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (65%)

Requests Now

17

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 17 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Van Tieghem. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.vantieghem.com

www.vantieghem.com

127 ms

minified.js

minified.js

33 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

focus-within-polyfill.js

30 ms

polyfill.min.js

polyfill.min.js

26 ms

thunderbolt-commons.dae61f88.bundle.min.js

thunderbolt-commons.dae61f88.bundle.min.js

87 ms

main.de20c391.bundle.min.js

main.de20c391.bundle.min.js

86 ms

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

main.renderer.1d21f023.bundle.min.js

85 ms

lodash.min.js

lodash.min.js

85 ms

react.production.min.js

react.production.min.js

82 ms

react-dom.production.min.js

react-dom.production.min.js

88 ms

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

browser-deprecation.bundle.es5.js

87 ms

siteTags.bundle.min.js

siteTags.bundle.min.js

86 ms

25c1d4_8c46d00c13214b9fb915f1b295eb4cdc.jpg

25c1d4_8c46d00c13214b9fb915f1b295eb4cdc.jpg

745 ms

bundle.min.js

bundle.min.js

39 ms

106 ms

103 ms

107 ms

104 ms

102 ms

99 ms

152 ms

152 ms

152 ms

149 ms

150 ms

146 ms

194 ms

deprecation-en.v5.html

deprecation-en.v5.html

5 ms

bolt-performance

bolt-performance

20 ms

deprecation-style.v5.css

deprecation-style.v5.css

7 ms

right-arrow.svg

right-arrow.svg

6 ms

Accessibility Review

vantieghem.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

vantieghem.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

vantieghem.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vantieghem.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Vantieghem.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vantieghem.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Van Tieghem. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: